That was cool, could you please let me know how/where you came across that "Let me Google that for you" site.
That was cool, could you please let me know how/where you came across that "Let me Google that for you" site.
That was cool, could you please let me know how/where you came across that "Let me Google that for you" site.
Sorry for the thread drift, but this post still just boggles my mind.Monte you're incorrect. When flying it does make a WORLD of difference if you're flying against or with the wind. If you're flying along and your ground speed is 50mph but you have a tailwind of 40mph your airspeed is now roughly 10mph. If the wing needs an airspeed of 20mph to avoid a stall you have a serious problem on your hands.
The exact opposite is also true (which we try to use to our advantage). Say you're flying along and your ground speed is 50mph and you are flying directly into the wind of say 40 mph. Your "Airspeed" is now 90mph. Let's assume this particular airplane has a stall speed of 30mph. You could, in theory, land this airplane with a ground speed of 10mph (airspeed 40mph - stall speed of 30 mph = ground speed 10mph).
That mass of air is very fluid/dynamic and if you're flying close to the stall speed of the aircraft you can bet your bottom dollar you'll want to know which directly and speed the wind is traveling in. This is exactly why planes will be landing from one directly (lets say East to West) and suddenly ATC switches them West to East. This is because they want to always land INTO the wind and when the wind direction changes enough ATC will change the traffic pattern to facilitate landing with a HEAD wind and not a tail wind.
By all means take it into a PM and we will hash it out. But please explain to me exactly what it is that boggles you so. It's possible that I'm tired and over looked something or even mis-spoke/typed. . .Sorry for the thread drift, but this post still just boggles my mind.
It is completely incorrect. What boggles my mind is that it's written by a licensed pilot.By all means take it into a PM and we will hash it out. But please explain to me exactly what it is that boggles you so. It's possible that I'm tired and over looked something or even mis-spoke/typed. . .
That was cool, could you please let me know how/where you came across that "Let me Google that for you" site.
That was cool, could you please let me know how/where you came across that "Let me Google that for you" site.
I don't remember where I saw it the first time but it was several years ago.
The software will increase thrust (where by trying to increase speed) and lower angle of attack if the aircraft gets too slow.
Yes it "can"stall physically but the Flight Controller over rides operator input to prevent stalls.
Funny
The controller had a full disconnect from the bird. Thats what happened. I have attached images of the onboard computer and its readings for the entire flight duration. Here they are again. View attachment 66885 View attachment 66887 View attachment 66886 S is the start of the flight. On the ground and E is the end of the flight, That is in the air............ The E should be on the ground even if it crashed.
The controller had a full disconnect from the bird. Thats what happened. I have attached images of the onboard computer and its readings for the entire flight duration. Here they are again. View attachment 66885 View attachment 66887 View attachment 66886 S is the start of the flight. On the ground and E is the end of the flight, That is in the air............ The E should be on the ground even if it crashed.
The air speed was around 70-80 feet per second. This did not stall, it was a powered dive. The log on this is not like an normal log. Even after a crash the E ends up on the ground where the bird crashed. This is still in the air. It was a complete system failure. The FPV footage shows the bird flying at level and then stops.
This was a complete and total failure of the disco. It just went haywire.
That was not a very steep climb. This thing is moving at 45-60 mph most of the time. The software limits the climb rate to whatever is best for the drone regardless of my input. It sort of removes the complete fun of the experience but still leaves enough to keep you wanting to fly it. It is like an autopilot that is very loose. It watches for movements and throttle pushes that could endanger the aircraft and it wont let you do them.Please post the FVP footage if you can.........I still think a deep full power stall caused the crash.
Did you initiate the steep climb or did the 'flight controller' do that?
That was not a very steep climb. This thing is moving at 45-60 mph most of the time. The software limits the climb rate to whatever is best for the drone regardless of my input. It sort of removes the complete fun of the experience but still leaves enough to keep you wanting to fly it. It is like an autopilot that is very loose. It watches for movements and throttle pushes that could endanger the aircraft and it wont let you do them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.