Bummed. New P3A Crashed. Pls Advise

Really, I think your best option is to buy a new P3 and sell the parts from the crashed bird. The motherboard, camera and controller are worth several hundred each. You would be adding a battery to your pocket.

Do NOT reuse that battery from the crash. It'll be the death of your NEXT drone. I say this from experience :(
 
Yes, go to flylog.info to download the tool. Roll, Pitch, and Yaw are in the .csv
Budwalker, I checked flylog.info and could not find the tool DatConverter. Can you send a link?
Are there tools to retrieve the GPS data in (.GPX or .KML)?

No.. there isnt. There is a prop wrench. There is never any mention from anyone associated with DJI that ever said it was for "tightening"! It is VERY well documented that the props should be tightened by hand. And the only mention ever of the use of the wrench is to REMOVE a prop that is too tight to remove by hand.
To be honest, DJI does not make very clear how tight the props should be. Sometimes they use two hands, sometimes only one. The amount of force is not mentioned. And yes, the wrench is also mentioned to tighten the props. See DJI Phantom @ t=7:22. DJI Forum|Phantom 3 Professional/Advanced Tutorial Collection
DJI implemented a special startup scheme to prevent loose props. It seems unlikely that this is an OP mistake. Power loss to the motor still looks a valid explanation.
 

Attachments

  • propeller wrench.JPG
    propeller wrench.JPG
    60.6 KB · Views: 250
  • Like
Reactions: JoBe and Oso
Budwalker, I checked flylog.info and could not find the tool DatConverter. Can you send a link?
.

It's in the "Offline Tools" section. Second paragraph, at the end of the first sentence. I'd send you a link but you need to read that section.
 
To be honest, DJI does not make very clear how tight the props should be. Sometimes they use two hands, sometimes only one. The amount of force is not mentioned. And yes, the wrench is also mentioned to tighten the props. See DJI Phantom @ t=7:22. DJI Forum|Phantom 3 Professional/Advanced Tutorial Collection
DJI implemented a special startup scheme to prevent loose props. It seems unlikely that this is an OP mistake. Power loss to the motor still looks a valid explanation.
Yes... You are correct. No-one has ever produced that before. Pre-flight Checklist video.. At the 7:22 mark.
Thank you

The motor startup routing really has no affect on prop tightness. I tested this in the past when I had an electric plane. And I can make a propeller come off by stopping the motor if the motor startup is all that is depended on for tightness. setting a prop on the motor and starting the motor leads to a more tight prop, but I can still get that situation to let a prop fly off.

I cant reproduce a flying situation to test what active breaking does, and how it affects a "loose" prop without a crash. Its just not smart.
 
Could you test it my holding onto the phantom landing gear while it tries to hover and rocking it around, seems like it would do whatever it could to try to hover....
 
Could you test it my holding onto the phantom landing gear while it tries to hover and rocking it around, seems like it would do whatever it could to try to hover....

I think that's similar to how people get hurt hand catching - if you try to move the bird by hand it's going to try to resist, possibly tipping and hurting you.
 
The preflight lasted roughly 133 seconds. During that time a compass calibration was done. This plot shows the MagMOD data during the preflight.
View attachment 35668


I'll speculate that the increase in MagMod happened when the calibration was finished. I.e., this calibration actually resulted in the magnetometer being further out of calibration. I don't think this was the cause of the crash though.

BTW, I've noticed that MagMod data usually shows a higher value than what is seen while the P3 is on the ground before launch.

That looks very much like a bad calibration. Resulting value was way out of range. This is a good example of not being able to depend on the P3 to tell you when the compass is not calibrated properly.
 
One of you guys determined the .DAT file I provided didn't match up properly to the .txt file. I've gone back in to download another file. Check this out and see if it matches the .txt (healthy drone) file. Thanks.
Dropbox - FLY014.csv
No it doesn't match. Top is the txt bottom is theFly014.csv.
When you convert the dat file into csv check the column gpsAltitude in excel - if its same height through out its not the right one

upload_2015-11-13_22-36-2.png
 
If you look at the amps in the last post, top part, the battery had to be connected until the end to draw that much...and record data. It also rules out CSC since that would also have killed the current.
 
100% of the information we have says this crash had power all the way till AFTER the initial impact, and was applying thrust to either 3 or 1 propellers. There is no doubt that the a prop came off in flight, and the prop falling was the cause of the crash. With the prop coming off it release the balance of flight, as well as torque to airframe, forcing the direction of rotation that is shown in the log file Its pretty much in DJIs hands as to whether they will, and to what degree, they might help.
 
Turns out we were looking at the wrong file. The file dates on the P3 often are incorrect (see the "Retrieve .DAT file" section on flylog.info) but this one was incorrect in a whole new way. Anyway, the flight recording lasted for 378 seconds. I peeled off the last 14 seconds to show here. Bottom line is that it would seem the battery was intact all the way to the ground. I made some plots but don't have time right now to look closer. If anybody else wants to take a closer look please do; I've attached that 14 second .csv.
upload_2015-11-13_16-37-56.png



upload_2015-11-13_16-52-19.png

upload_2015-11-13_16-52-38.png

Note: the yaw swings from +180 to -180 because it's passing through 180
upload_2015-11-13_16-54-3.png

There's all kinda cool plots to look at. These are just a few. It'd be interesting to see if anything can be learned by looking closer when the event occurred. Did one corner pitch down like what would happen if the prop came loose. The .csv should be inside that .zip that's attached.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-11-13_16-54-52.png
    upload_2015-11-13_16-54-52.png
    13.3 KB · Views: 250
  • FLY012end.zip
    454.4 KB · Views: 113
Bottom line is that it would seem the battery was intact all the way to the ground.
We knew that from the first bit of data we got. The cant be recorded data after the impact if there was no power. And there is no way for the 4 pints to have contact and not the 2 large connectors on the battery because the 2 large blade connectors have a deeper penetration into the female slots than the pins even stick out.
 
Here is the best chart I could make, it would appear that the pitch and roll diverge at the same time. Based on earlier data in the flight and assuming the craft flew mostly forward, it would appear that positive pitch is nose down, which seems opposite to me. Anyway, if that is the case I would guess the intact prop was one of the front props. At the same time roll went very negative. I am not sure if that is bank left or bank right, but if it follows normal aircraft convention negative would be lowering left side which would indicate the left front prop. If someone knows the sign convention it would be interesting to see if it matches the intact prop. I also checked all the accelerometers and gyros to see if there was anything that occurred prior to this (collision) and found nothing. As a result I believe I agree with a lost prop during flight....
 

Attachments

  • Graph.png
    Graph.png
    64.5 KB · Views: 297
Here is the best chart I could make, it would appear that the pitch and roll diverge at the same time. Based on earlier data in the flight and assuming the craft flew mostly forward, it would appear that positive pitch is nose down, which seems opposite to me. Anyway, if that is the case I would guess the intact prop was one of the front props. At the same time roll went very negative. I am not sure if that is bank left or bank right, but if it follows normal aircraft convention negative would be lowering left side which would indicate the left front prop. If someone knows the sign convention it would be interesting to see if it matches the intact prop. I also checked all the accelerometers and gyros to see if there was anything that occurred prior to this (collision) and found nothing. As a result I believe I agree with a lost prop during flight....
You can tie this same point in time to the sudden change in compass data. Even more clearly showing a loss of lift in one corner. The direction of rotation defines the color of blade that was lost.
 

Recent Posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
143,094
Messages
1,467,605
Members
104,980
Latest member
jakob08z