- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 480
- Reaction score
- 109
- Age
- 47
Really, I think your best option is to buy a new P3 and sell the parts from the crashed bird. The motherboard, camera and controller are worth several hundred each. You would be adding a battery to your pocket.
Do NOT reuse that battery from the crash. It'll be the death of your NEXT drone. I say this from experience![]()
Budwalker, I checked flylog.info and could not find the tool DatConverter. Can you send a link?Yes, go to flylog.info to download the tool. Roll, Pitch, and Yaw are in the .csv
To be honest, DJI does not make very clear how tight the props should be. Sometimes they use two hands, sometimes only one. The amount of force is not mentioned. And yes, the wrench is also mentioned to tighten the props. See DJI Phantom @ t=7:22. DJI Forum|Phantom 3 Professional/Advanced Tutorial CollectionNo.. there isnt. There is a prop wrench. There is never any mention from anyone associated with DJI that ever said it was for "tightening"! It is VERY well documented that the props should be tightened by hand. And the only mention ever of the use of the wrench is to REMOVE a prop that is too tight to remove by hand.
Budwalker, I checked flylog.info and could not find the tool DatConverter. Can you send a link?
.
Yes... You are correct. No-one has ever produced that before. Pre-flight Checklist video.. At the 7:22 mark.To be honest, DJI does not make very clear how tight the props should be. Sometimes they use two hands, sometimes only one. The amount of force is not mentioned. And yes, the wrench is also mentioned to tighten the props. See DJI Phantom @ t=7:22. DJI Forum|Phantom 3 Professional/Advanced Tutorial Collection
DJI implemented a special startup scheme to prevent loose props. It seems unlikely that this is an OP mistake. Power loss to the motor still looks a valid explanation.
Could you test it my holding onto the phantom landing gear while it tries to hover and rocking it around, seems like it would do whatever it could to try to hover....
The preflight lasted roughly 133 seconds. During that time a compass calibration was done. This plot shows the MagMOD data during the preflight.
View attachment 35668
I'll speculate that the increase in MagMod happened when the calibration was finished. I.e., this calibration actually resulted in the magnetometer being further out of calibration. I don't think this was the cause of the crash though.
BTW, I've noticed that MagMod data usually shows a higher value than what is seen while the P3 is on the ground before launch.
No it doesn't match. Top is the txt bottom is theFly014.csv.One of you guys determined the .DAT file I provided didn't match up properly to the .txt file. I've gone back in to download another file. Check this out and see if it matches the .txt (healthy drone) file. Thanks.
Dropbox - FLY014.csv
Initially, a KML producer wasn't high my to-do list. But, I can see now that it'd be useful and it's not to hard to do.Are there tools to retrieve the GPS data in (.GPX or .KML)?
We knew that from the first bit of data we got. The cant be recorded data after the impact if there was no power. And there is no way for the 4 pints to have contact and not the 2 large connectors on the battery because the 2 large blade connectors have a deeper penetration into the female slots than the pins even stick out.Bottom line is that it would seem the battery was intact all the way to the ground.
You can tie this same point in time to the sudden change in compass data. Even more clearly showing a loss of lift in one corner. The direction of rotation defines the color of blade that was lost.Here is the best chart I could make, it would appear that the pitch and roll diverge at the same time. Based on earlier data in the flight and assuming the craft flew mostly forward, it would appear that positive pitch is nose down, which seems opposite to me. Anyway, if that is the case I would guess the intact prop was one of the front props. At the same time roll went very negative. I am not sure if that is bank left or bank right, but if it follows normal aircraft convention negative would be lowering left side which would indicate the left front prop. If someone knows the sign convention it would be interesting to see if it matches the intact prop. I also checked all the accelerometers and gyros to see if there was anything that occurred prior to this (collision) and found nothing. As a result I believe I agree with a lost prop during flight....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.