Yeah, I never fly without mine anymore. Just for a solid signal when flying non-distance is a good deal.Had windsurfer on it ... Full disclosure
Yeah, I never fly without mine anymore. Just for a solid signal when flying non-distance is a good deal.Had windsurfer on it ... Full disclosure
snerd, I'll go out now and give it a try so you have another data point.Good news! I was on about Oso because his setup is similar to mine with the iOS devices and the latest app the Go. I want to make sure before overwriting the existing config file. I would think I'll have to go into all the options again to set them back where I had them.
Thanks! Actually, I already overwrote on my iPhone. But will wait until I do the iPad.snerd, I'll go out now and give it a try so you have another data point.
but still not convinced with the idea that the upper channel could give more range than the lower one !!!
I just got back from flying around a nearby park. P3A, Air 2, 1.3.2, GO app, extended channels enabled.Thanks! Actually, I already overwrote on my iPhone. But will wait until I do the iPad.
It looks like the added "channels" are a lot quieter than the stock 8. Which means less signal interference between RC and bird. Maybe smoother video. However, I'm not very good at electronics............. if you can convince me it's a useless mod, I'm open to review it.I don't understand this mod. It really doesn't go up or down further (add frequency) just adds channels in between. The stock channels already overlap if you look at them on an analyzer. So not sure what the deal is ????
Sent from my SM-T700 using Tapatalk
Is it possible for "the top" to be quieter or less used? Resulting in better signal? Like I said, I'm always open to being educated.............Going to top of what you have now maybe.
Yes. But you can go to the top without mods. The stock top channel is 1/2 channel higher than the additional one added in the hack. At least I think so. It's a known fact 802.11 channels are wide and overlap. I am just throwing it out there as this makes no sense to me.
Well I don't know. My understanding besides N "mimo" being multi channel is it's wider yet. The 22khz current channels are really broad and not sharp so even 8db off center they are not very many db down. Looking at the skirt profile I just don't see how putting 32 channels in the same frequency space helps. Just trying to figure out what I am missing....Rrm,
Look into 802.11n
The LB system in the P3 utilizes MIMO w/ODFM modulation on the downlink.
Whataya think?
Keep in mind this hack does not extend the frequency range outside of stock range. Still same span. Does not get into ham bands.****! Looking up references on the frequencies, it's obviously a very crowded frequency range! And hams are "secondary" users up there, in the 13cm band, behind the ISM users. Our world has gotten much smaller over the last 50 years.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.