Marked cross walk? Bit like our Zebra or Pelican crossings. (not a wind up we really do have those)
Bill I don't have the time to find it but if you'll dig around you'll find it written many times over in the FARs in the FAA. Also it's common sense that a small plastic toy aircraft will not have any right of way over a manned aircraft of any kind.BigAl07,
I totally agree with the sentiment here, but can you say where you actually read this?
--
Bill
I bought an iOS app for monitoring air traffic. Unfortunately the LAPD copter doesn't show up consistently. You'd think they'd have transponders on all the time for ATC. Also a lot of private planes don't either. So at the end of the day it's up to me to be super vigilent.
As such, I make sure I'm well away from the cop heli. You wouldn't have to interfere with them--they could make up their own version of the facts and you'd have to explain yours to the judge after being cuffed or worse.
The data in those apps can be delayed up to 5 minutes buy gov't. regulation.
FAA helicopter routes are published with their own charts. They are Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Dalles, Houston,Los Angeles, and New York. END OF LIST. All other routes are rouge and are illegal. Helicopter pilots.will argue but the law is not on their side. In most cases the FAA refuses to enforce laws created by congress (FARS). Be careful it is the Wild West out there. If we all agree to follow the (Guidelines). and stay below 400' who polices the manned aircraft? There is enough airspace for everyone. The manned aircraft need to get up where the law saws they are supposed to be. Write your.congressmen as the FAA will not do anything.Helicopters have no altitude restrictions except as called out in paragraph (a).
Paragraph (1) grants an exclusion that fixed wing aircraft must otherwise observe.
§91.119 – Minimum safe altitudes: General.
[Doc. No. 18334, 54 FR 34294, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-311, 75 FR 5223, Feb. 1, 2010]
Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:
(a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.
(b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft.
(c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.
(d) Helicopters, powered parachutes, and weight-shift-control aircraft. If the operation is conducted without hazard to persons or property on the surface—
(1) A helicopter may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, provided each person operating the helicopter complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA; and
(2) A powered parachute or weight-shift-control aircraft may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section.
Mike
[file]Chopper|none[/file]
I was at 390 feet. Who wins in court after the mid air collision? Aren't they supposed to stay above 400? Almost looks like he was below me.![]()
Most pros in the aviation industry know how dangerous this can be....especially those pros that operate helicopters. The pros avoid it altogether whenever they can. Regardless, for many of the rookies, even those flying multi-million $$$ USCG helicopters, hedge hopping and flying illegally is just as tempting and fun as it is to operate our multi-rotors outside the established boundaries. It's good old human nature at work....the thrill of the "risk."
There's a saying we hear often around the airport"
"There are brave pilots and there are old pilots... but there aren't any Old & Brave pilots."
Bold! Yes that's it lolYea, 'round here it's Old an Bold.
Kinda rhymes I guess.
Helicopters have no altitude restrictions except as called out in paragraph (a).
Paragraph (1) grants an exclusion that fixed wing aircraft must otherwise observe.
§91.119 – Minimum safe altitudes: General.
[Doc. No. 18334, 54 FR 34294, Aug. 18, 1989, as amended by Amdt. 91-311, 75 FR 5223, Feb. 1, 2010]
Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the following altitudes:
(a) Anywhere. An altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.
(b) Over congested areas. Over any congested area of a city, town, or settlement, or over any open air assembly of persons, an altitude of 1,000 feet above the highest obstacle within a horizontal radius of 2,000 feet of the aircraft.
(c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.
(d) Helicopters, powered parachutes, and weight-shift-control aircraft. If the operation is conducted without hazard to persons or property on the surface—
(1) A helicopter may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, provided each person operating the helicopter complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA; and
(2) A powered parachute or weight-shift-control aircraft may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section.
Mike
[file]Chopper|none[/file]
I was at 390 feet. Who wins in court after the mid air collision? Aren't they supposed to stay above 400? Almost looks like he was below me.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.