Welcome to PhantomPilots.com

Sign up for a weekly email of the latest drone news & information

  1. LonelyGod

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2018
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    3
    Hey guys!
    I'm newbie. Cheers.
    I am working on boosting the effective RF range for P4 pro v1.0 and v2.0. (Guess the method should be the same despite Lighbridge for P4P 1.0 while Ocusync for P4P 2.0). Here are my questions concerning the range extending solution and hope you guys can help me out.

    1. Antenna Function
    1) There are four antennas on the RC and four anttenas on the aircraft (correct me if I was wrong)----confirmed
    2) The left antenna on the RC is for transmitting control signal to the drone only(Tx) while the right one is for receiving FPV streaming from the drone only(Rx)/Both the two antennas can work as a transmitter or receiver simultaneously----to be confirmed
    [​IMG][/url][/IMG]
    antenna.png

    3) Two front legs (#1 & 2) are for FPV transmitting while two back legs (#3 & 4) are for control signal receiving----to be confirmed

    2. Modification Solution
    My trial is to add both booster(power amplifier) and antenna (more gain) to the RC/drone (or both)
    1) Here is my current setup:
    I removed the stock antennas from the RC and mounted two SMA jacks. I used one 2.4/5.8 auto-switch and bi-directional AMP from Sunhans on the left jack. I wired both SMA jack to two panel antenna and drive them with a tracking gimbal. Any problem?
    1.png
    2) or I should do the following:
    2.png
    3) I did see some 3rd party solutions that use 2 AMPs on the RC. Does it really make sense?
    Also, AMPs have one input port(to radio) and one output port(to antenna), I found the setup in the picture below shows that the 2 RF cables from the RC always go to the input port of the AMP first and then to the atenna. Does it confirms both antennas on the RC have transmitting functions besides possible receiving funtions? a bit confused.......
    90b0708627c5c4bac9de937424c9b44.png

    3. Modification Solution in the future
    I am designing further. See the picture below. Any suggestions? For example: Long trace of RF cable brings with more signal loss and thus may even exhibit poorer performance than stock antennas?
    3.png
    Thanks for your interest guys!!!!!!
     
    heliozinhow likes this.
  2. LonelyGod

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2018
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    3
    :kissingcat:come on!
     
    kyawko likes this.
  3. Boggus

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2017
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    4
    Would love to have some sort of extender mounted to a vehicle, mounted on the roof to extend signal. Maybe connections mounted inside that you could plug your remote in?

    Think of a mobile drone command vehicle that has monitors, etc. Need a better way to move signal (tree environment) tethered drone that is a repeater? Maybe another option.
     
    kyawko likes this.
  4. SimonH78

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2014
    Messages:
    417
    Likes Received:
    81
    Location:
    UK-Lancashire
    What happened to keeping VLOS - ??
     
    kyawko, LARA images and MtManDavey like this.
  5. N017RW

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    8,520
    Likes Received:
    2,890
    Location:
    Palm Beach Co.- FL
    Someday the FCC may get involved too.
    These type mods require licensure since they would no longer be Part-15 compliant.
     
    kyawko and MtManDavey like this.
  6. LonelyGod

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2018
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    3
    Thanks for reminding. But this project will be tested outside US. Any technical suggestions will be really appreciated!
     
    kyawko likes this.
  7. Fat Albert

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2018
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    My Evolite uses the “B” configuration, my unamped panel antenna does just fine but if I use it amped I can drop down to 50’ three miles away with solid bars
     
    kyawko likes this.
  8. FlyingUser

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2018
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    24
    Apart regulatory questions, looks really cool!

    The directional antenna makes sense if the drone moves in a tight pattern but also risky, if the drone gets out of the lobe.

    Do this things make sense if the FCC mode is active? I mean, is there enough battery life to get out of range at all?
     
  9. wa5tef

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2017
    Messages:
    916
    Likes Received:
    367
    Location:
    Saltillo, Mississippi
    With my simple parabolic reflectors on my controller antennas I can outfly my battery and VLOS! Without more battery life anything further is overkill is it not? Sure it’s fun to experiment but I doubt drones were intended for such. However there are parabolic dish antennas available on eBay that require only an adapter cable to mate with the dish’s “N” type cable to get some 24dbi gain at 2.4 GHz and even more on 5.8 GHz! I learned years ago from being a long time Ham (56 years) to put my attention in the antenna system, not simply more power. Antenna improvements help transmit and receive almost equally.
    Good luck
    Jim
    WA5TEF
     
  10. MtManDavey

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2018
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    27
    We ham radio operators sometimes bounce signals to each other using the surface of the moon as a reflector. It takes a huge antenna system on both the transmitting and receiving stations, as well as lots of power to transmit those signals. While LG's experiment does not compare to that feat, it's always interesting to see what technical devices one comes up with to enhance operation of a sUAS, even when staying VLOS.

    Living in a forested area doing commercial real estate work, some of this may in fact be useful and not merely a experiment as to how far you can launch a stone with a slingshot. So, here's my suggestion for further technical experimenting... build a small directional antenna system for the ground station such as a corner reflector, far more directional than the dual band flat antenna depicted. Hopefully, keep the bird in direct sight, and when it approaches the horizon, bring it back. Signal wise, this should work, all frequencies being line of sight, even if out of VLOS as LonelyGod appears to be wanting to do outside of the U.S., where VLOS is still the FCC requirement with or without visual observers.

    Good luck LG, perhaps this will actually lead to something useful for all of us.

    Dave W6PS
     
  11. FlyingUser

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2018
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    24
    I am afraid if you go BVLOS, the very short wave DJI frequencies won't serve you much, regardless how strong amplifiers and antenna arrays you connect to your RC.
     
  12. MtManDavey

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2018
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    27
    FlyingUser, thanks for your response, but I respectfully disagree.

    At the frequencies used by the sUAS system, line of sight is line of sight, whether you can still visually see the aircraft or not. When my P4P goes to maximum legal AGL, I have to look carefully to see it. People do fly beyond VLOS and count on FPV, which is in itself highly effective, but definitely BVLOS and any improvement of signal would add effective control over the aircraft. Any improvement of signal strength, whether VLOS or BVLOS is an improvement and there are atmospheric conditions that can change the path and reflection of signals.

    Using VHF and UHF ham radio frequencies, and those in the bands we legally use near the DJI frequencies per FCC regs, we do experience oddball conditions, including one called "multi-path", where signals that erratically bounce off of nearby or even distance objects can interfere with the signals sent to and arriving directly from the desired signal. For those that seem to lose control of a sUAS at strange times, this may be a contributing factor. If one can achieve a stronger signal directly to and from the bird, this would diminish side effects and provide better control of the aircraft.

    Please note that I am no fan of going BVLOS. I am merely commenting on experimentation suggested by the originator of this thread, and appreciate any experimentation that will help all of us fly better and with better control.

    Cheers
     
  13. 3putts

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2017
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Brookings, Oregon
    Drive or walk closer to what you want to fly over, 3.1 miles with mine is too far. Never tried it.
     
    MtManDavey likes this.
  14. FlyingUser

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2018
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    24
    Seems I used the wrong term, meant without obstruction. Other words, if you see your bird with binoculars, you're good. Multiple trees not to mention buildings in the way: I am skeptical.
    I see an advantage of this system where there is a strong interference from domestic wi-fi though.
     
  15. roosta

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2017
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Australia
    I've got myself the 4Hawks range extender for the P4p. I recently installed it but am yet to fully test it out in the open. Some good results and not as bulky as you would think..

    RoOSTA
     
  16. D0CT0R

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2018
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    4
    I would speak to James Crutchfield at Titan Drones, as what you're attempting to do, he already does. And he does it REALLY WELL too.

    I bought the "V2" of his Command Case that allows me to use 14" Omnidirectional Whip antenna's, or the 2 directional panels built into the lid.

    Take a lQQk https://www.commandcase.com/copy-of-command
     
  17. Dan Lee

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2017
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    23
    Location:
    Sweet Home Alabama
    I want to get a parabolic range extender for my P4P but there are so many different ones to choose from. I’ve even read reviews that said some not only worked better but also fit better. Which one do you have and are you happy with it?
    Thanks in advance.
     
  18. GadgetGuy

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2015
    Messages:
    6,667
    Likes Received:
    2,094
    You don't state what country you intend to use this in, nor what range you are currently getting that you wish to exceed, nor how you intend to deal with exceeding the battery capacity, nor whether these are only one way flights. The answers will determine the best method. A completely stock P4P, set to Auto 5.8 Ghz, in the U.S., with clear LOS, will easily reach 5 miles away, which is at the very edge of the battery capacity to return home under ideal conditions. No setup will solve LOS obstructions at long distance.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - Pro Range Extender Forum Date
Tested a $9 dollar range extender. It worked but no miracle product. General Discussion May 27, 2018
Argtek blue proton range extender. Standard Oct 20, 2017
Standard BlueProton DJI Phantom 3 Standard WiFi Signal Range Extender Antenna Kit by ARGtek Phantom 3 Help Aug 5, 2017
Phantom 3 Pro/Adv Range Extender Classifieds Jun 6, 2017
P4PRO RANGE EXTENDER - titan drones "conquer" (is this the best range extender out there??) Phantom 4 Pro Discussion Apr 8, 2017