Are you actually referring to the Original Poster?
??
No - I am referring to the Quoted passage in that post..... quote of ''KMixson'' post where he says he confronts people ......
Nigel
Are you actually referring to the Original Poster?
Oh. I didn’t get that out of his post. I thought most or all of what he said was about people confronting him. I didn’t see where he confronts people first.??
No - I am referring to the Quoted passage in that post..... quote of ''KMixson'' post where he says he confronts people ......
Nigel
Oh. I didn’t get that out of his post. I thought most or all of what he said was about people confronting him. I didn’t see where he confronts people first.
Spying with drones is such a misconception.but the public has been brainwashed. Anyone who’s says they’d shoot one down if they see one has some screws loose and is a real danger to society. Of course if one was flying around my house ar very low alt I would have a talk with owner but one flying over at 75+’ would not be an issue .people are always up in arms over what others do but what they do is all ok . Before I started flying had a neighbor that would fly his remote airplanes over and between our houses all the time was never an issue I enjoyed watching them . After all during the day even the buzz of a drone overhead is not as bad as the neighbors lawn mower ,are kids screaming,etcGuy already was prosecuted for shooting down a drone .... he claimed Drone was videoing his daughter sunbathing .......... at 8 o'clock at night ??
I believe he went to jail ... and then some bunch of do-gooder Tree-Huggers petitioned fro him to be released ....
Nigel
Spying with drones is such a misconception.but the public has been brainwashed. Anyone who’s says they’d shoot one down if they see one has some screws loose and is a real danger to society. Of course if one was flying around my house ar very low alt I would have a talk with owner but one flying over at 75+’ would not be an issue .people are always up in arms over what others do but what they do is all ok . Before I started flying had a neighbor that would fly his remote airplanes over and between our houses all the time was never an issue I enjoyed watching them . After all during the day even the buzz of a drone overhead is not as bad as the neighbors lawn mower ,are kids screaming,etc
The big difference is alt agree if someone is 50’ overhead and buzzing your dwelling then a confrontation is in order but if someone’s flying over at a respectful alt then no difference then the crop duster that flys over my place every spring at 150’ turning to make his runs . And I live in a very rural place . All the same someone shoots at my drone will have some major issues to deal with and he would regret his choiceI would shoot one down over my land and I'm no danger at all to society.
Imagine buying a place out in the middle of no where to get away from all of the noises of the city. Now, your sitting in the middle of a 40 acre area that you consider your paradise, your piece of the Earth. You've worked your butt off for years to be able to buy it. I would not want someone flying in, flying around, while I'm sitting there trying to enjoy it!! Around the edge? Ok, nothing I can do about that. In the middle? It's coming down!
Some of you guys need to put some of this into some perspective. Some property owners put up with a lot of nonsense and in some area's you still own your property and do have some say in what happens.
Don't get me wrong, I probably would confront them first as a warning. I've also caught hunters and allowed them to stay, I've walked up on a guy that pulled a gun and told me it wasn't my property, trash, 4 wheelers, trees cut down, etc.........
We all don't live or hang out in the same area's. Different places have different rules, whether legal or "unwritten".
Anyone that understands guns will understand this.....If your over someones land and it(drone) can be taken down with a shotgun? It's too close!!! 200-300 feet or more up? who cares!!
That wasn't all directed to the quote, just replying and blended the thought with the rest of the posts I've read.![]()
Kids came and you still had money?..alas, kids came and money got tighter.
The big difference is alt agree if someone is 50’ overhead and buzzing your dwelling then a confrontation is in order but if someone’s flying over at a respectful alt then no difference then the crop duster that flys over my place every spring at 150’ turning to make his runs . And I live in a very rural place . All the same someone shoots at my drone will have some major issues to deal with and he would regret his choice
I'm not anti drone at all. I just think private property should be respected with our drones. I'm not even for more laws...But there should be a respect that goes with flying these things around. There isn't going to be a one rule that fits all.
Either way, I've never shot one down, I don't think many of us have had one shot down, so it's all in fun!!We're all here for the some of the same interests.
If someone shoots at mine? Well? Where was I with it? Did I deserve it? I can't say they would regret their choice, that all depends on the situation.
Now, If I could just figure out how to teepee my neighbors house with it? That would be some funny stuff!!! We are friends by the way.![]()
I agree ... even if its not law - please respect other peoples expectation of being able to do in their garden etc. without thought of another spying ... even if not ...
Nigel
Ya, it goes both ways, my thoughts were...not every one that would shoot a drone is "a danger to society" but not everyone with a drone is honest and respectful either. It all depends on situation.
I agree , it's all about the situation and if someone it's been and idiots messing with my privacy or just passing by ... remember they can't see your posted sing from up there so they may not even know they are flying over your property ....
Also why don't you try to shoot the airplanes that fly over your property if it bother you so much ?
But shooting a drone down with a shot gun it's going to be very hard unless it's flying very low. I hunted ducks for years and it's very rare if any one reach one flying over 150 feet ... the small pellets don't have much weight and loses power and the pattern spreads up , won't even penetrate a cardboard over a couple hundred feets or so straight up. Slug shooting or rifle fast moving small target ? Forget it . You may get lucky one day if the guy fly by every day and you take a shot every day lol
So yes if you can shoot a drone down its flying to low but did he knew you don't like him flying over ?
Make a huge drone sing that they can see from the sky ... lol while you are at it make one for ETs ...
But yes under stream circumstance I did shoot one down my self to...
The laws vary from state to state and county to county. But generally if you’re in the united stated you need permission to fly over anyone’s home , if you’re under 200 ft. And permission to fly over their property. Doesn’t ,matter if its for a second or 10 minutes. But I would go with the advice that its best to pick your battles. I have a similar problem with 2 neighbors out of 10. I just stay away from those 2!!! Problem solved!!
I try my best to be ethical and legal; so here is the result of my research from numerous sources.
1. There has to be a "reasonable expectation of privacy".
2. The National Airspace System tops out at 50,000 feet and bottoms out just above the grass in your backyard and the roof on your house.
3. The airspace above the dirt that your house sits on is considered a "regulated commons".
4. It is up to the individual to provide for his own privacy.
Examples: Anyplace inside your own home is private. Back yard, without a fence and roof: no expectation of privacy. Female sunbathing in the nude in the yard: Not private. Same thing with a tall fence: private from ground level but NOT from the air. Put a roof over it: private.
Fly over in a satellite, balloon, plane, helicopter, drone; no reasonable expectation of privacy. But land in the grass = trespassing. In flight, the FAA rules the operation and the US Supreme Court demands that the FAA prevails over state and local laws.
Take photos of the outside of a property: not trespassing and no expectation of privacy. Sunbathing female: unless privacy is provided, take all the photos you desire; not trespassing.
All these are legalities but ethics and reason should prevail. Many people are paranoid and unreasonable and demand political correctness. These same people are the type who would kill to enforce their warped views. Personally, I would not carry on a conversation with one of these type individuals, but if the police, who are mostly uninformed, tried to bully me, I would definitely and politely inform them of my rights and if they were not convinced, I would request a conversation with their chief. Of course, civility and ethics should always prevail. I contacted our local police chief in advance, told him of my drone activities and offered to inform him of the applicable laws regarding my activities. Now, he can assume that I know the laws and intend to not be in violation of them .I then flew over his house and took photos of it.
First hand experience: my wife is an artist. She and a fellow artist were photographing and painting a church. The priest demanded that they leave, grabbed their paintings and called the sheriff. NM law states that from a public road or other place, there is no expectation of privacy. They can paint, view and take photos all they want. That priest eventually was removed.
Not sure what country you reside in but in the United States our National Air Space tops out at FL600 or 60,000' MSL for Class A... that was on my part 107 exam.I try my best to be ethical and legal; so here is the result of my research from numerous sources.
1. There has to be a "reasonable expectation of privacy".
2. The National Airspace System tops out at 50,000 feet and bottoms out just above the grass in your backyard and the roof on your house.
3. The airspace above the dirt that your house sits on is considered a "regulated commons".
4. It is up to the individual to provide for his own privacy.
Examples: Anyplace inside your own home is private. Back yard, without a fence and roof: no expectation of privacy. Female sunbathing in the nude in the yard: Not private. Same thing with a tall fence: private from ground level but NOT from the air. Put a roof over it: private.
Fly over in a satellite, balloon, plane, helicopter, drone; no reasonable expectation of privacy. But land in the grass = trespassing. In flight, the FAA rules the operation and the US Supreme Court demands that the FAA prevails over state and local laws.
Take photos of the outside of a property: not trespassing and no expectation of privacy. Sunbathing female: unless privacy is provided, take all the photos you desire; not trespassing.
All these are legalities but ethics and reason should prevail. Many people are paranoid and unreasonable and demand political correctness. These same people are the type who would kill to enforce their warped views. Personally, I would not carry on a conversation with one of these type individuals, but if the police, who are mostly uninformed, tried to bully me, I would definitely and politely inform them of my rights and if they were not convinced, I would request a conversation with their chief. Of course, civility and ethics should always prevail. I contacted our local police chief in advance, told him of my drone activities and offered to inform him of the applicable laws regarding my activities. Now, he can assume that I know the laws and intend to not be in violation of them .I then flew over his house and took photos of it.
First hand experience: my wife is an artist. She and a fellow artist were photographing and painting a church. The priest demanded that they leave, grabbed their paintings and called the sheriff. NM law states that from a public road or other place, there is no expectation of privacy. They can paint, view and take photos all they want. That priest eventually was removed.
I’m going on the fact that I was informed from my local sheriff that if I stayed around 200 ft I can fly over homes because of property rights . I live on outside of my city and have woods then homes around me, I have gotten permission by most of my neighbors to fly around because they know I’m not snooping or whatever, and for the ones that don’t say ok, If I fly lower it could be I’m trespassing on their property. I know there’s no FAA rule stating this , but unfortunately we are at a time of transition and too many entities are trying to regulate us!!!! I understand only FAA laws or rules are predominate , but you can’t tell that to a sheriff or city cop!! Well you can but I will have to pass on that because I know what they do when you tell them they can’t do something!!!! Lol ... until the laws are clear, until everyone understands its FAA who is in control of airspace, until they make more laws clarifying everything...... everyone will have to deal with their local government!!!!Can you please cite in the FAA rules part 101 subpart E, part 107 or your local laws where you obtained your information!
I'm not convienced there is any predefined minimum flight level (e.g. 200') over a home for sUAS. Facts benifit us all.
I thought the rules state you can fly over persons that are under safe cover, such as a protective structure (e.g. home) or stationary vehicle (e.g. non convertable automobile). If you were to read the Notice of Proposed Rule Making for sUAS Rules the discussions brought up many valid points of consideration but in the final rule making the FAA was vary cautious about over restricting what levels we can fly. We have a small slice of NAS from ground level to 400' in the USA and they don't specify 50', 100', 200' etc. for ones privacy. They have left that to community standards and organizations like the AMA. Unless your working some commercial venture it would be impractical to get permission to over fly everones or even ones property.
I’m going on the fact that I was informed from my local sheriff that if I stayed around 200 ft I can fly over homes because of property rights . I live on outside of my city and have woods then homes around me, I have gotten permission by most of my neighbors to fly around because they know I’m not snooping or whatever, and for the ones that don’t say ok, If I fly lower it could be I’m trespassing on their property. I know there’s no FAA rule stating this , but unfortunately we are at a time of transition and too many entities are trying to regulate us!!!! I understand only FAA laws or rules are predominate , but you can’t tell that to a sheriff or city cop!! Well you can but I will have to pass on that because I know what they do when you tell them they can’t do something!!!! Lol ... until the laws are clear, until everyone understands its FAA who is in control of airspace, until they make more laws clarifying everything...... everyone will have to deal with their local government!!!!
If that were my two story house and someone few that low and close, I would also be annoyed. Probably angry if it happened often. Of course, I'm in the "get off my lawn" age group so maybe I'm not the best judge.
I would if they were loud and drove by often. Same with those exceptionally loud motorcycles. Its wonderful for you that you don't mind. Cheers.Just curious, do you have problems with people that drive by your house in their car
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.