First, thank you for posting the language you were citing. It's important to be on the same page when discussing such things.
Second, your need to invoke the logical fallacy of ad hominems severely hobbles your argument(s). If you don't have the respect for others and patience to engage in a chat-forum discussion, then why do so?
Your self-described lack of patience may contribute to your broad interpretation of the language.
So let's discuss
your statement which first drew my attention:
"Just so you know in any emergency
anyone can get on
any frequency and report it! Faa or Police or Fire Channel "
Now let's compare that to
CFR49 ss. 97.403:
"No provision of these rules prevents the use by an
amateur station of any means of radio communication at its disposal to provide essential communication needs in connection with the immediate safety of human life and immediate protection of property when normal communication systems are not available.
Compare your term "anyone" to the CFR's term "amateur station". Do you not make a distinction between the two? I do and it significantly reduces those persons who can do what you claim.
In reading further we see the text:
"any means of radio communication at its disposal ".
Fine, however the likely hood of an amateur operator having trunked computer controlled digital or commercial broadcast equipment at their 'disposal" is unlikely nor do I interpret the statute granting authorization to operate equipment outside their license.
Finally, here's one such article which sums up the role of Hams during NIMS type incidents:
Ham Radio in Emergency Operations
I hope this better makes my points that not just anyone can operate on any channel/frequency without license or outside their license.
Hams do play an important role during emergencies but it is to supplant communications not replace Public Safety systems or allow them to be 'taken over". This has helped the community retain precious bandwidth with ever increasing demand by new technologies and industries.
Cheers!