Rotorpixel said:This is textbook "jello", Geert, and is specifically why we used variable tightness thumbscrews in each of the vibration dampers. No two P2V systems were created equal when it comes to vibration frequency and amplitude, so everyone will require a slightly different amount of tightening/loosening of the white thumbscrews in order to eliminate vibrations. Be careful that the screws are not tightened so far that the pitch control cable (coming from the underside of the P2V) becomes pinched between the gimbal and the P2V body. Also be careful not to tighten them so much that the gimbal frame contacts the underside of the P2V directly - when such contact occurs, the P2V motor vibrations are essentially transferred directly to the camera... which is not a good thing!
Keri
Keri, can you comment on some posts mentioning reducing power to the motors as a way of reducing their vibration, as I find it a little odd to have to do something like that, especially given the reduction of vibration and jello by the correct twiddling of the thumbscrews ? This reduced power option seems a little extreme to me and something which you would no doubt have recognised when you tried the slightly less powerful motors ? Is it fair to say that really the vast majority of people would expect just to use the damper setting as a means of reducing vibration and jello ? The less tinkering with settings the better as far as I am concerned.