- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
- Messages
- 52
- Reaction score
- 4
- Age
- 42
Hello everyone
I realize. I know.
The p4p vs mp has already been covered.
But my scenario is a bit different.
For all other trips, I'll have my car. So the portability factor isn't a must.
I don't travel by train, bus or public transport - where portability is truly a positive factor.
But I regularly take day & weekend trips on my adventure bike.
By now, most of you are saying 'go for the mp'.
But, its a large bike. I won't have a passenger.
I've got side panniers for my luggage. That leaves me with space for a rear top case on the rear rack and an empty passenger seat that I could strap down a hard case or bag with the p4p in it.
Not a huge issue for me personally.
The added features of the p4p make it worth it to me.
I have a phantom 1.5 with a gopro gimbal. I'm very familiar with flying a quad.
My only niggle is when we've stopped along the way, it's not as practical as an mp to hike around with.
Like everyone else, I love how portable the mp is.
And considering the activity I'm asking about, obviously the mp makes more sense.
My major gripe with the mp is the lack of 60 fps at 2k.
I can live without 60 fps at 4k.
But no 60 fps at 2k and poor 60 fps at 1080 is kind of a show stopper.
Please don't think I'm criticizing the mp.
No, I realize it's purpose is different from the p4p.
Like a high end point & shoot vs a dslr. Example to emphasize size not quality.
Each with its pros & cons.
I guess I'm trying to find a way to make the p4p work for me.
I guess this thread is :
Should I really get the p4p or is the mp portability really worth the lack of p4p features & camera quality
And if the p4p, which bag/case?
I could strap down a hard case, but that would mean I couldn't take it along if we went hiking.
I'd like a semi hard bag that's compact. Super compact. A p4p, 3 batteries & the charger.
Preferably a bad with mounting straps or handles along the sides that I could use to strap the bag down.
I realize. I know.
The p4p vs mp has already been covered.
But my scenario is a bit different.
For all other trips, I'll have my car. So the portability factor isn't a must.
I don't travel by train, bus or public transport - where portability is truly a positive factor.
But I regularly take day & weekend trips on my adventure bike.
By now, most of you are saying 'go for the mp'.
But, its a large bike. I won't have a passenger.
I've got side panniers for my luggage. That leaves me with space for a rear top case on the rear rack and an empty passenger seat that I could strap down a hard case or bag with the p4p in it.
Not a huge issue for me personally.
The added features of the p4p make it worth it to me.
I have a phantom 1.5 with a gopro gimbal. I'm very familiar with flying a quad.
My only niggle is when we've stopped along the way, it's not as practical as an mp to hike around with.
Like everyone else, I love how portable the mp is.
And considering the activity I'm asking about, obviously the mp makes more sense.
My major gripe with the mp is the lack of 60 fps at 2k.
I can live without 60 fps at 4k.
But no 60 fps at 2k and poor 60 fps at 1080 is kind of a show stopper.
Please don't think I'm criticizing the mp.
No, I realize it's purpose is different from the p4p.
Like a high end point & shoot vs a dslr. Example to emphasize size not quality.
Each with its pros & cons.
I guess I'm trying to find a way to make the p4p work for me.
I guess this thread is :
Should I really get the p4p or is the mp portability really worth the lack of p4p features & camera quality
And if the p4p, which bag/case?
I could strap down a hard case, but that would mean I couldn't take it along if we went hiking.
I'd like a semi hard bag that's compact. Super compact. A p4p, 3 batteries & the charger.
Preferably a bad with mounting straps or handles along the sides that I could use to strap the bag down.

