P3 flight battery will be a 4S 4480mah 15.2v

N017RW

Premium Pilot
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
8,960
Reaction score
3,254
Location
Palm Beach Co.- FL
The P3 is the same size physically. This maximizes profit margin.

I also believe a 4S LiPo is rated at it's nominal voltage which is 14.8v not 15.2v.

Lower capacity (and maybe some slight improvements) reduces cell size allowing them to squeeze in 4 cells.
 
Joined
Mar 3, 2015
Messages
296
Reaction score
33
Location
Alberta Canada
The P3 is the same size physically. This maximizes profit margin.

I also believe a 4S LiPo is rated at it's nominal voltage which is 14.8v not 15.2v.

Lower capacity (and maybe some slight improvements) reduces cell size allowing them to squeeze in 4 cells.

Yup 4S is 14.8v but oddly enough, I got the voltage from the DJI website.

8B47FC5C-B10F-4320-83C5-AFECEF3996E9.jpg

8300D79F-2E7C-497E-B552-DED4F8C5C9A2.jpg
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
453
Reaction score
63
Location
Glen Burnie, MD
So... stupid question: Would this mean that the 3S batteries are wholly incompatible, or do you think they'd work, but just with lesser flight time?
 

N017RW

Premium Pilot
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
8,960
Reaction score
3,254
Location
Palm Beach Co.- FL
Yup 4S is 14.8v but oddly enough, I got the voltage from the DJI website.

8B47FC5C-B10F-4320-83C5-AFECEF3996E9.jpg

8300D79F-2E7C-497E-B552-DED4F8C5C9A2.jpg


Acknowledged.

Seems fishy to change the nominal volt/cell rating method between P2 and P3.

Maybe to 'sound or look' better???
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
63
Reaction score
4
but... now 23 minutes... before (p2v) 25 minutes... I don´t know why use 4S then...
 

N017RW

Premium Pilot
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
8,960
Reaction score
3,254
Location
Palm Beach Co.- FL
No.

There is no forward or reverse compatability.

The P2 is 3S (11.1V) the P3 is 4S (14.8v).
 

N017RW

Premium Pilot
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
8,960
Reaction score
3,254
Location
Palm Beach Co.- FL
Yea I know.

I've been using LiPos for about ten years and those numbers are atypical specifications.

Look up any 4S LiPo [nominal] voltage and get back to me.

DJI has decided to spec. it at a different charge level.

This same level would spec. the P2 Batt. an 11.4v, atypical.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
499
Reaction score
11
but... now 23 minutes... before (p2v) 25 minutes... I don´t know why use 4S then...
Most likely the p3 is heavier and to compensate for the weight/flight-time ratio, a whole new power system is used, one that requires more amps, discharge rating hence 4 cell instead of 3.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
499
Reaction score
11
It's about the same weight ...
Weight (including battery and propellers)
1280 g
It just has a lot going on, powering lightbridge etc and needs more juice.
that's a dollar a gram! (almost)
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2014
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Yea I know.

I've been using LiPos for about ten years and those numbers are atypical specifications.

Look up any 4S LiPo [nominal] voltage and get back to me.

DJI has decided to spec. it at a different charge level.

This same level would spec. the P2 Batt. an 11.4v, atypical.
Hmm, one question would be, what would the nominal voltage be on the new LiPo chemistry that has a peak charging voltage of 4.35v/cell instead of 4.2v/cell?

These have been showing up in phones since early 2013 (Oppo Find5 had a 4.35v cell, so does Find7 and Sony Xperia Z3) - these cells might have a 3.8v/cell nominal rating instead of 3.7.

At least some people rate the 4.35v cells with a nominal of 3.8 instead of 3.7 - http://www.highpowertech.com/product_096ffc299200f517.html

That might be another reason DJI broke compatibility, if they switched to a new chemistry, they would have had to stick with incompatibility even at 3S.
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
141,483
Messages
1,456,024
Members
103,269
Latest member
TDAlldridge