How High can I Legally Fly

Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
4,665
Likes
2,214
Location
Los Alamos, NM.
#5
The height to antennas is 1,729 ft. Are there any other local or state ordinances or restriction in area.
That's still clear of the Class B airspace. There may be local restrictions on takeoff/landing operations - I was only addressing the "how high" question.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2018
Messages
441
Likes
248
Location
Miami-Dade
#6
That's still clear of the Class B airspace. There may be local restrictions on takeoff/landing operations - I was only addressing the "how high" question.
You would need to have the streets and sidewalks closed as you would not be able to fly over people or moving cars legally.
 
Likes: athearnsd45
Joined
Oct 29, 2018
Messages
441
Likes
248
Location
Miami-Dade
#8
That's still clear of the Class B airspace. There may be local restrictions on takeoff/landing operations - I was only addressing the "how high" question.
So let’s say that there are takeoff and landing restrictions and with knowledge that they don’t control the airspace and that I can legally be there, can I do a hand launch and catch legally.
 
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
4,665
Likes
2,214
Location
Los Alamos, NM.
#10
So let’s say that there are takeoff and landing restrictions and with knowledge that they don’t control the airspace and that I can legally be there, can I do a hand launch and catch legally.
I think that the "hand launch" tactic to get around takeoff and landing restrictions has been debunked enough to discount it. You would still be present, on the ground, launching a UAV. And sitting it on a chair doesn't work either.

I would at least need to close sidewalk just Incase someone comes strolling by.
Not if you took off from one of the lower roof areas - then you would not have to fly over any sidewalks.

Is this a serious question?
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2018
Messages
441
Likes
248
Location
Miami-Dade
#11
I think that the "hand launch" tactic to get around takeoff and landing restrictions has been debunked enough to discount it. You would still be present, on the ground, launching a UAV. And sitting it on a chair doesn't work either.



Not if you took off from one of the lower roof areas - then you would not have to fly over any sidewalks.

Is this a serious question?
Yes it is. Just wondering, that would make for some great pics.
Downtown Chicago is beautiful.
 
Likes: ianzone
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
1
Likes
0
Age
61
#14
Unless you have special permission - we call it an OSC - you aren’t going anywhere unless you want to risk a criminal prosecution.
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
98
Likes
57
Age
28
#15
Legally you can fly 400ft agl, or 400ft above the highest structure agl, as long as you remain within 400ft horizontally of said structure.
IMG_4580.jpg


That being said, finding a place in Chicago were you aren’t over active roadways, or people (people restriction can be bypassed via parazero) you are allowed to, assuming you takeoff and land from public property.
 
Joined
Jun 25, 2015
Messages
965
Likes
374
Age
66
#17
Legally you can fly 400ft agl, or 400ft above the highest structure agl, as long as you remain within 400ft horizontally of said structure. View attachment 108100

That being said, finding a place in Chicago were you aren’t over active roadways, or people (people restriction can be bypassed via parazero) you are allowed to, assuming you takeoff and land from public property.
"(people restriction can be bypassed via parazero)
What? A parachute alone will not make a flight 107.39 legal. You still need an FAA waiver.
 

BigAl07

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
6,117
Likes
4,608
Age
48
Location
Western North Carolina
#18
(people restriction can be bypassed via parazero)
In the US you either have to have a WAIVER for that action or when the new regulations go into effect (they are just proposals right now) you must have the correct aircraft, equipment and you'll probably still need some type of permit/paper to certify you.
 
Likes: skymonkey

BigAl07

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
6,117
Likes
4,608
Age
48
Location
Western North Carolina
#20
I should have specified AGL ... I took it as read that everyone knows it’s AGL and not MSL or .... AMSL or in broadcast engineering terms HAAT.

This picture probably describes it better (off the CAA website)

View attachment 108111

Hope this clears any confusion

That's a very good graphic. Good find and share :)
 

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
132,944
Messages
1,377,421
Members
97,073
Latest member
mitchmodified