arinvideo said:What is the big worry.. there are a bunch of Chinese sellers on ebay selling parts it may take a extra few days to get to you but no reason to start hoarding.
macheung said:For those who are wondering if it possible to use a non dji battery on the p2 or p2v, there is an active thread going on at rcgroups. http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2085480
I for one do not appreciate being locked down. Those batteries are good granted, but single sourcing a critical consumable item is just a bad idea. Especially if extra effort is placed into the product to lock it down instead if other improvements. Made better battery? Good for you. Place it on the market and let people decide, but don't out of your way to lock down your product.
Pull_Up said:developing the battery first (which, on a power to weight measure, seems to be more efficient than most other batteries out there - it may be a chemistry thing, as well as an electronics thing in which case more costs to recover).
dittoPull_Up said:DJI themselves spec the battery as good for 300 charging cycles. Based on my current number of cycles and % of life reported by the battery via the Assistant that is both realistic and a little conservative (I don't push my batteries hard, though - always land before they drop below 18%).
Assuming an average of 22 mins flight per discharge cycle that works out at about £1 per hour of actual flying time as an ongoing "consumable" expense... Obviously that's +/- but doesn't seem outrageous to me (especially as a two-battery sortie, with travelling and setup time keeps me out of the house for about an hour and a half). Actually - capital cost of aircraft aside - that seems **** cheap for something I enjoy rather a lot! I would get my wife, who's an accountant, to amortize the capital cost into the expected lifespan of the whole unit plus depreciation and factor in some extra for spare motors, etc, to get a true hourly cost but I'd actually quite like to keep my genitalia intact a bit longer.![]()
jondrew said:Pull_Up said:developing the battery first (which, on a power to weight measure, seems to be more efficient than most other batteries out there - it may be a chemistry thing, as well as an electronics thing in which case more costs to recover).
Or it could be the old "razor blade" business model. Give away the razor and make your money on the blades"
Not sure $1100 for a Phantom is exactly "giving it away"
What are people's experience with batteries" How many charge/discharge cycles before they start getting pooped?
Pull_Up said:"[A]ssociate" seems a very deliberate choice of words in that release, doesn't it?
Is this a real link? :|nmacpherson said:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.