No, you have the tinfoil hat so you are safe!I took it as a complete threat to my existence!
No, you have the tinfoil hat so you are safe!I took it as a complete threat to my existence!
What does that mean? Flapping blades?Remember the quad doesn't have collective control of the rotor blades, or 'flapping' blades, as in helicopters, so it is more constrained.
In addition to a standard helicopter's ability to vary the pitch of the rotor blade, both collectively (to go up and down) and cyclically (to alter the rotor 'disc' orientation, go forward/sideways), a helicopter's blades can 'flap' up and down and do so as a helicopter flies forward. Eliminates the tendency for the helicopter to roll over when flying forward. Also look up 'flap-back' in Wikipedia. Robinsons (R22/44) don't have 'flapping' rotors, but 'teeter' instead, same effect. Not implemented on a quad, rotors are fixed.What does that mean? Flapping blades?
Interesting you would say that.. See pic below. I've been trying to figure out what I am seeing here.In addition to a standard helicopter's ability to vary the pitch of the rotor blade, both collectively (to go up and down) and cyclically (to alter the rotor 'disc' orientation, go forward/sideways), a helicopter's blades can 'flap' up and down and do so as a helicopter flies forward. Eliminates the tendency for the helicopter to roll over when flying forward. Also look up 'flap-back' in Wikipedia. Robinsons (R22/44) don't have 'flapping' rotors, but 'teeter' instead, same effect. Not implemented on a quad, rotors are fixed.
You're seeing the effects of a camera phone.Interesting you would say that.. See pic below. I've been trying to figure out what I am seeing here.
The shadow seems to suggest otherwise.You're seeing the effects of a camera phone.
It's either an effect of the cell phone (the most likely) or an inspire flying with extremely bent props... Much less likely.The shadow seems to suggest otherwise.
The shadow is scanned over time just like the Phantom blades, so the CMOS artifact would be expected.The shadow seems to suggest otherwise.
The Inspire would not be able to fly if the props were as bent as the image suggests.The shadow seems to suggest otherwise.
Ok, that makes some sense. The shadow being just as bent as the props is harder to grasp because on the surface it 'seems' as though it corroborates what the photo is showing with the props.The shadow is scanned over time just like the Phantom blades, so the CMOS artifact would be expected.
If something moves during the data collection of a CMOS device, like a prop or the shadow of the prop, it will move from line to line of a single frame which results in the twisted artifact.
If you know the shutter speed of the frame, you can calculate the prop RPM.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.