A good place to start might be to demonstrate to yourself that certain of your assumptions can’t be true.You're absolutely right! I've simply presented what the video shows, right down to the high zoom and slow motion. I've made no claims as to what it is. Organic, inorganic, I don't know. I do know it reflects light and runs across 30 frames. I'm not a forensic video analyst, but I think someone with that pedigree could be helpful to determine the initial visible location of the objects. I'm all for critical analysis. I've spent a week tearing it apart, so I thought I'd post it up here. It's probably the most critical place to post a vid like this.
If an object is 1000 feet from the phantom you can apply some simple maths to determine, having regard to the FOV of the camera and the maximum pixels available to record the image, how big the object must have needed to be to take up 100pixels across the frame.