Presidential Candidates' Views on Recreational Drones?

Joined
Sep 22, 2016
Messages
499
Reaction score
151
Location
Warm & sunny Southern California
I'm not referring to military drones, but what do we know about the U.S. presidential candidates' views on recreational or commercial drones?
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
509
Reaction score
221
Location
Baltimore MD
It is a very important question that deserves a well measured answer, and while everyone agrees freedom is important we have to weigh the responsibility of the public safety and make reasonable and common sense decisions.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2016
Messages
19
Reaction score
4
Age
52
With all the issues in the US your really not going to base your decision on that are you?


ATP, CFII, MEI, RPO
Part 121, 135, and 91 Corporate Pilot
30 years of exploration.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cfd701

BigAl07

Administrator
Staff Member
Premium Pilot
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
7,042
Reaction score
5,905
Age
52
Location
Western North Carolina
With all the issues in the US your really not going to base your decision on that are you?


ATP, CFII, MEI, RPO
Part 121, 135, and 91 Corporate Pilot
30 years of exploration.


I guess it depends on where your priorities are, just how much $$ you have invested, and if you're doing it for hobby or as a dedicated full-time business. These criteria could very well sway how important the issue really is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoCalDude
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
509
Reaction score
221
Location
Baltimore MD
Does not matter... the President is not involved in such matters. It's the FAA, land owners/managers and local idiots who matter.

The President can issue executive orders to any agency directing their rules and regulations, unless said rules and regulations are actual law. Once that EO is issued it can take years in court to have it removed.

Since the parameters for the 107 aren't part of law (the dictate is as I understand it) they could be changed by an EO without you having a chance to sneeze first.

I think it is a very relevant thing to people who care about flying UAS.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
4,850
Reaction score
2,069
Location
Salt Lake City, UT
The President can issue executive orders to any agency directing their rules and regulations, unless said rules and regulations are actual law. Once that EO is issued it can take years in court to have it removed.

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (issued by the Senate), which governs UAV's in the air.

Since the parameters for the 107 aren't part of law (the dictate is as I understand it) they could be changed by an EO without you having a chance to sneeze first.
Part 107 only applies to commercial use. Why take action against a small minority and not all UAV use in general? It makes no sense for the President to do this.

I think it is a very relevant thing to people who care about flying UAS.
If attempting to regulate UAV private UAV use is _anywhere_ on the President's radar, we have bigger issues.

The FAA is _already_ in charge of UAVs. There is simply no reason for a President to become involved in such a small matter.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
509
Reaction score
221
Location
Baltimore MD
The FAA is _already_ in charge of UAVs. There is simply no reason for a President to become involved in such a small matter.

And yet they could. Politicians will pander to their constituents simply to look like they are doing something. Never underestimate what any politician will do, or where they might turn their focus.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
4,850
Reaction score
2,069
Location
Salt Lake City, UT
And yet they could. Politicians will pander to their constituents simply to look like they are doing something. Never underestimate what any politician will do, or where they might turn their focus.

As mentioned above, Senate passed a law governing UAVs. You have stated that the President cannot pass an EO against exiting laws. UAV's are an extremely small "issue" that has _already_ been dealt with, there is no indication from any person running that they would do anything on the matter (even if they could) and no actions have ever been taken by a President om UAVs.

I guess he/she "could" try. But I think we might want to look at the obvious nature of the answer, that the President is not involved in such matters.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2017
Messages
55
Reaction score
10
Age
65
It's not just the candidates opinion of drones - it's the congress's opinions. They hold the law making ability. I can see some presidents saying OMG we have to stop that terrorist tool!!! (and cell phones, and pressure cookers, and bacpacs, and BB guns, and big knifes, and and and). It's the climate of we are going to wrap our arms around you poor innocent beings so that no one can ever hurt you.... 1984. So, yes -- basing my vote on something this "trivial" would be silly; but basing my vote on the mind set that made something this trivial just one more match to the fire is not so silly.
But that's just me...
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigAl07

Recent Posts

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
142,358
Messages
1,461,846
Members
104,162
Latest member
Boufou