P3: Flying near strong WIFI interference

Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
208
Reaction score
5
Doing so and seemingly randomly (sometimes it works perfectly even near many office buildings); but sometimes not - the downlink becomes garbled, disappears, or parts of it are seen as in broken encoding in a DivX file. Have you experienced it? Any ideas on improving such sitautions?
 

jlo

Joined
May 17, 2015
Messages
479
Reaction score
216
Location
FL
It's a problem here in the urban sprawl. The only thing you can do is get away from it. I can get about 1600-2000ft in my neighborhood before the downlink starts to get choppy.
 
Joined
Jun 9, 2015
Messages
310
Reaction score
201
Location
Scottsdale, Arizona USA
It's a problem here in the urban sprawl. The only thing you can do is get away from it. I can get about 1600-2000ft in my neighborhood before the downlink starts to get choppy.
I get no more than about 1200 feet before the same thing happens in my neighborhood. Wifi is everywhere there are businesses and homes.
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
1,206
Reaction score
136
Doing so and seemingly randomly (sometimes it works perfectly even near many office buildings); but sometimes not - the downlink becomes garbled, disappears, or parts of it are seen as in broken encoding in a DivX file. Have you experienced it? Any ideas on improving such sitautions?
Mod controller and use WiFi amps to boost power. Problem solved. Modding the controller to use external antennas is not a simple process tho but you can have others do it for you.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
208
Reaction score
5
I think it's the WIFI that's everywhere, especially some more powerful transmitters mounted in office buildings... Makes me think that for some applications; the older phantom with video downlink to a monitor is better - less delay; and bad signal does not result in decomposition of the image, but only more noise in the video; while you can still control in real time.
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
1,206
Reaction score
136
I think it's the WIFI that's everywhere, especially some more powerful transmitters mounted in office buildings... Makes me think that for some applications; the older phantom with video downlink to a monitor is better - less delay; and bad signal does not result in decomposition of the image, but only more noise in the video; while you can still control in real time.
The Phantom 2 (non Vision) still used a 2.4ghz RC signal so even if you could still see an analog FPV signal your control signal could still be affected. You could actually add a 5.8ghz FPV connection to a Phantom 3 if you wanted to. It's being done to the inspire. Only downside is a little added weight by the 5.8ghz video transmitter, camera and battery to power it all. That and you'll need a second monitor and or goggles to see that transmission.
 

ianwood

Taco Wrangler
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
5,109
Reaction score
2,041
Location
Lost Angeles
Lightbridge requires a lot of bandwidth. Macro blocking is not uncommon in a urban landscape. You should first verify your setup is good. Take it to someplace where there is no WiFi noise and make sure the tablet is set up properly. Then when you're back in town and you see break ups, you'll know its interference and not some other issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sammynels
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
198
Reaction score
97
Location
Cincinnati, OH
I have only ever been able to get about 3000' shooting out of my house-dense neighborhood. Once I got away from all the wifi routers and headed to the beach I was getting around 2 miles! It makes a lot of difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mati
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
208
Reaction score
5
Why did they disable the custom video transmission setting? It was the difference between not being able to work and being able to sometimes.
 

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
135,378
Messages
1,400,710
Members
98,610
Latest member
Ohliuw