Please post the weight of the OEM shell, and your carbon fiber shell prototype.I just bought a new p3 shell a and I'm going to make a mold then lay up carbon fiber shells. I'll post here when I'm done
Please post the weight of the OEM shell, and your carbon fiber shell prototype.I just bought a new p3 shell a and I'm going to make a mold then lay up carbon fiber shells. I'll post here when I'm done
I just bought a new p3 shell a and I'm going to make a mold then lay up carbon fiber shells. I'll post here when I'm done
I just bought a new p3 shell a and I'm going to make a mold then lay up carbon fiber shells. I'll post here when I'm done
Depends. Where? How?Sounds to like I should pick up a small sheet of aluminum and cut out a few pieces and mount them to the arms?? Do you think this will help?
It's very unlikely that the motor just ripped itself out during normal flight. It had to have been involved in a crash or very hard landing. Just my opinion.
The op had admitted that he had a crash soon after buying the quad. I think the damage was started at that time but he did not open it up to see if any damage occurred.I saw the pictures of it and I disagree, it was a massive failure that looked like it followed right along crack lines that had developed. I had a P2 almost reach that stage but I replaced the shell long before it reached the point that his did. My other P2 had a failure where the screws that hold the motor in the bottom shell had two of the mounts totally separated from the bottom shell. It also wasn't far from becoming a motor departing in flight. No one seems to be concerned except the people who have had these problems, that is until it happens to them. Consider yourselves lucky. But I agree 100%, everyone is entitled to their opinion.
I think the new motors have a larger base. Maybe better for heat dissipation.That FLIR post may show the smoking gun. After a minute? Imagine 20 minutes later on a hot day. That in combo with high frequency vibration is too much stress for the plastic.
I am liking the idea of a heat sink -or radiator- but I'd be putting them around the exposed top barrel area of each motor. That'd put them in the prop wash and have metal to metal contact for better heat transfer.
Sounds to like I should pick up a small sheet of aluminum and cut out a few pieces and mount them to the arms?? Do you think this will help?
I just bought a new p3 shell a and I'm going to make a mold then lay up carbon fiber shells. I'll post here when I'm done
I would like to buy one when you are ready. I am sure you will become very rich making these. Good luck and keep me posted.I just bought a new p3 shell a and I'm going to make a mold then lay up carbon fiber shells. I'll post here when I'm done
Buy a shell on line and use that, if it turns out to be good people like myself will buy it from guys like you. I bought my P3P as a tool for my photography business I can't be worried about it dropping out of the sky because of the motor falling out from crack motor mountsI´m doing the same. The hardest part is perfecting the shell mold beacuse it has lots of vents and the angles must be 100% due to the motor anchoring angles and PB fixings. But it will sure be lighter, stiffer and stronger.
I´ll also try reinforcements on the arms and around motor support on another new shell using kevlar strips instead of CF (harder to cut but easier to lay up and glue inside the shell). My original shell is still perfect after lots of flying, so I´m not messing with it unless of course it starts cracking.
Like this (don't laugh)...
![]()
I have the UAV strong arms arriving (not sure when as im in Aus). The UAV strong arms adds assurance to the shell and motors. I have done the aluminium method as prevention for motors only. You can always add cable ties for the shell but I think its more critical for the motors as the shell has (pain in the ***) clip sections and will keep the shell intact.
I've done an addition 40minutes of flights and the cracking has ceased with the 0.35mm aluminium mod. The aluminium is installed on the non-cambered screws (look closely and you will see 2 that are even and the other 2 are higher and lower. The reason for this was to get the perfect length screws (incorrect length will damage the motor). I really think the mod I have done is enough to prevent motors from separating as it will distribute the pressure like a washer and act as contingency.
If you do decide to do the mod, just take note that the motors are rotated differently to accommodate the cambers. One side will be 16mm from screw to screw and the other will be 19mm from screw to screw. So you will need 2 x 16mm and 2 x 19mm plates.
I will let you know how this progress...
Buy a shell on line and use that, if it turns out to be good people like myself will buy it from guys like you. I bought my P3P as a tool for my photography business I can't be worried about it dropping out of the sky because of the motor falling out from crack motor mounts
Thanks Alex, good luck I will look forward to your advancements.Yes that´s exactly what I´m doing. Besides using 2 cracked shells borrowed from friend´s P3s I ordered 2 new shells and will experiment differently with both. I´ve been looking into this issue on every shell I have access to, since mine´s still intact 2 months in with lots of flights. IMHO the best solution may be just add some structural reinforcements to the arms and core from the inside.
Not just the tips as some suggest, the shell is basically a monocoque structure (i.e. the shells ARE the structure). So it should be looked as a whole. If strenght is added only to the failure point (s) and/or around it, the stress in other parts might increase and lead to failure in other areas of the body with time. I´m also adding small kevlar strips to the outside area of the shell tips (near the motors) in order to help in case of crashes.
I did a lot of that kind of work in my RC models, from cars to copters and drones. I´m using a cracked shell from a friend´s P3A to mold a 100% CF shell but it´s very time and labor consuming, and I´m still far from being satisfied with the results. CF is awesome but the shell body has lots of angles, vents and recesses, it´s pretty hard without industrial tools. The P3 is indeed a precision instrument.
So far from what I´ve done and seen, I´d say the best solution may be to just build "better" shells using the existing plastic ones from DJI (the original) with very precise and well executed internal reinforcements. Faster, cleaner, cheaper (the shells aren´t that expensive, and if you think a "better" shell might last longer then it´s a good investment). Also nicer looking and still stiffer and stronger than the plastic original, without any potential compromises in performance - as it keeps the specs of the original!
I´ll keep posting as I make advancements.
You do know that DJI will replace the shell for anyone unfortunate enough to develop cracking?Wow, it is sad the things owners have to do because DJI won't provide a well designed lower frame!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.