E_T said:Which is better for video? I've read some claims that 720p/60 is the best, and there are even less artifacts. Also, someone mentioned that the bitrate is only around 12 Mbps, which hinders the quality of 1080p filming.
I disagree 30fps or 60fps whatever the resolution are equal in detail and sharpness, provided that they both have their shutter settings at 180 degrees, that would be 1/50th (Ideally1/60th), and 1/100th, (ideally 1/120th).Geert said:I agree 60fps is much smoother but it depends what you want to do with the video.
A video recorded at 1080p 30 fps gives you more detail and sharpness, especially when you look it on a large TV screen.
Geert./.
platonas1 said:So if you want to fly a mission with Ground Station and record the path, it is better 720p/60 ?
jimandsue60 said:What about shooting in 1080 60 FPS and then slowing it to 1080 30 FPS? I really like how it looks.
When you view it on a large screen the difference is more obvious. (I use a 40" as computer screen). The compression seems very high on these clips anyway. is it a V+ camera?vortigern said:The difference in quality between 1920 and 720 is not that discernible on the internet. Whether when projected in a hall there is a big difference it is possible. A quick demo all taken within minutes of each other. http://vimeo.com/109468181
Yes it is a standard v+ I will check it in a hall with a projector using less compression sometimesergekouper said:When you view it on a large screen the difference is more obvious. (I use a 40" as computer screen). The compression seems very high on these clips anyway. is it a V+ camera?vortigern said:The difference in quality between 1920 and 720 is not that discernible on the internet. Whether when projected in a hall there is a big difference it is possible. A quick demo all taken within minutes of each other. http://vimeo.com/109468181
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.