156 Seconds of Utah..

Very good .i bet you will get someone saying you shouldn't fly over people .We you weren't you were flying in between people .
 
That was nice and you didn't bore the viewer with long timed shots of the same area which is the mistake many people make.

There is nothing more boring IMO than having 20 seconds plus of the same scene area - especially over the water.

I must take 40 seconds of my bath water sometime to make me fall asleep. :)

It was varied which held my interest. Well done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotARubicon
Shot last week using my Phantom P3A, Osmo, and iPhone, in/around Moab, Canyonlands National Park, Dixie National Forest, and Bryce Canyon.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Is this what you were referring to using Vivid in your other thread ?
 
Is this what you were referring to using Vivid in your other thread ?
Yes.. The Utah video (above) was the 2nd video using "Vivid" - Not happy with it.

The first video using Vivid was at California's Largest lake (below) - Happy with it:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dirkclod
Yes.. The Utah video (above) was the 2nd video using "Vivid" - Not happy with it.

The first video using Vivid was at California's Largest lake (below) - Happy with it:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Yea saw that and like both . I use Vivid but all we have is green here so I like it plus I don't do anything post. Just wondered if that was what
you were referring to .
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
143,554
Messages
1,471,425
Members
105,547
Latest member
pickwicknick