Correct. That’s why I mentioned the FAA site for further info.
Yes, but your first statement was still inaccurate.
You stated,
"The FAA has provided 6 month extension on
compliance."
Not true.
Only the
enforcement was extended,
not the compliance.
It is a critical distinction, yet most people still don't understand the difference.
I wanted to clarify and correct your misstatement.
Mentioning the FAA site for further info about your false statement doesn't correct your mistake. It implies support for your statement can be found there, when, in fact, it will contradict your statement.
99% of people reading your post will neither watch Greg's video nor go to the FAA site, where they will likely just get lost in all the legalese! They'll just read your first sentence.
Glad we got it sorted out before more people get confused!
To put a bow on it, the real issue isn't the extension of FAA enforcement.
It is insurance coverage being in jeopardy because the compliance deadline remains unchanged!
Most drone liability insurance requires compliance with all FAA regulations. Since the compliance date remained unchanged, those insurance policies may all now be voidable by the insurance companies and all claims denied, if the drone pilot is not in compliance with RID, no matter why! That the FAA isn't enforcing it is not an excuse for noncompliance to the drone insurance company.