L
larrym
Guest
"Do you have a parachute and airbags in case it happens over land?"
Great idea. I'll get right to work on that.
Great idea. I'll get right to work on that.
Who are Sheldon Leonard and Penny?And with that I'm going in to watch Sheldon, Leonard & Penny to see what they come up with tonight! Lol
Very sensible and littered with common sense - go to the top of the class.These hopeful contraptions really are silly.
It's an irrational fear that makes timid flyers think they are a good idea.
People touting them say they are to save the Phantom in case the worst happens.
Do you have a parachute and airbags in case it happens over land?
If you are unfortunate enough to have a fall-from-the-sky incident, your Phantom does not make a gentle descent and land on it's undercarriage.
It's going to be spinning and tumbling and will crash upside down. The Phantom will get a soaking.
If it's salt water, within 1/10th of a second, all that can be saved would be the sd card and the props.
Everything else is toast.
If it's fresh water ... maybe it could be dried and repaired - but maybe not.
If your Phantom comes down half a mile out, do you have a safety boat on standby to go and find it?
But the most important point is what lumbering a Phantom like this does to its aerodynamics.
We never hear anything about this from the designers and constructors.
How much does it slow the Phantom down? How much flight time does it reduce with the added wind resistance?
How much does it increase the wind's ability to blow your Phantom away?
Most of my flying is over water and there's no way I'd ever handicap my Phantom with any of these contraptions because I always want to bring it home.
A cost-benefit analysis shows, they will cost you every flight in lost performance while any benefit is much less than imagined and only likely in very rare circumstances that never happen anyway.
That's a loss-lose situation.
Unless you actually want to land and take off on water, these things are more likely to cause the loss of your Phantom than do anything to save it.
I'm honestly just doing it for a experiment. Landing in the pool and taking off from the pool.
I'm honestly just doing it for a experiment. Landing in the pool and taking off from the pool.
Sure ...go ahead and ignore those that actually know what they are talking about.lol Don't let the naysayers get you down. A hobby is supposed to be fun, right? So rock on and ignore the Debbie Downers. If we all do they'll go berate someone else.
A quick OT FYI - they are characters in an enormously popular and successful US television sitcom called The Big Bang Theory.Who are Sheldon Leonard and Penny?
Well... I pulled the trigger on the Waterstrider.
I don't disagree with Meta4's thoughts on this, and in fact have been flying over water all summer, with a bit of a "use it or don't" approach. A fall to water won't fare any better than a fall to pavement...
But the decision came from a couple of things... being able to get the lower level shots with a little more confidence:
![]()
...but probably moreso because the more adventurous I get, and having been invited to remote cabins, there have been numerous occasions where there is simply NO safe RTH landing point:
![]()
Yes, I do hand catch when in this situation, but that won't help if/when I have a loss of signal RTH and it doesn't come to within reach of me on that dock.
Besides... they're pretty cool. It's all part of the experimental adventure... I expect they'll catch some wind but I'm still curious enough to try them.
If they make me happy... yay me.
And red pods are finally back in stock!
![]()
Looks like they work...
![]()
Yup won't be down bottom but it would be just paper weight after like mine once it went under.Good point. My thought is I would sill do all I can to keep it from tipping but if it does tip it will HOPEFULLY float even if it is upside down, atleast you can go out in a boat and get it and it won't be down bottom.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.