I mean more comparing the Phantom 3 Pro with the GoPro which uses the same sensor but the Phantom produces a much better image by having a better lens (among other things)not if the sensor's resolution is less than the lens resolution
I mean more comparing the Phantom 3 Pro with the GoPro which uses the same sensor but the Phantom produces a much better image by having a better lens (among other things)not if the sensor's resolution is less than the lens resolution
To get those narrower modes the GoPro crops the sensor which gives you a worse image than the already dated one on the Gopro.
The non fisheye lens mod for the GoPro is not a simple replacement and costs several hundred dollars on top of the already overpriced GoPro's.
GoPro has always been soft and a lot of guys change the values on the Phantom to get softer videos anyway but for photos you want it tack sharp right?
The GoPro still has distortion (fisheye) with its native FOV and the wide angle capture which needs to be fixed in post is not equal to what comes out of the Phantom.GoPros no longer shoot with fisheye anymore. The lens and image is a worlds difference from Hero 3+ and Hero 4 compared to the previous models. If fisheye you mean wide angle? Then, yes the GoPro still shoots wide angle. They also have a "remove fisheye" feature in GoPro Studio. But, i never use GoPro Studio. There also very useful techniques on After Effects and Premiere Pro that get rid of the fish eye.
We agree to agree...that could be a first on this board.Fair enough, and I agree.
There are really just two things I want. I want the obstacle avoidance, BADLY, but I will have that with the H which I am already definitely getting but I also really want that tracker. If that works, it's a game changer. Even in the test, it doesn't work so great. As someone that tracks objects daily, I can tell you, tracking aint easy and they will never, NEVER get it perfect but i'll take good.
Yeah that Tested video wasn't impressive, it does have some features that aren't possible on the Phantom 3 but it isn't a major upgrade like the Vision+ to the Phantom 3.We agree to agree...that could be a first on this board.
After watching the "Tested" YouTube video, which was publish an hour before the actual P4 announcement. I wasn't impressed when they too it through its paces and it failed.
I'm sure they will button it up. I just refuse to buy anything just released by DJI(learned it with my P2v+, P3A and unfortunately with my Osmo)..... don't get me wrong, I'm a fan boy. Just a very cautious one.
I'm expecting this Phantom 4 camera to be between the Inspire X3 and X5 in quality for much less cost.
I will be doing a side by side comparison when I get my hands on it as will a few others I'm sure.
Osmo - horrible audio, drifting issues
I want ask about aperture, is it manual on phantom 4 ? Sorry for bad English
Don't be put off the Osmo, it really is awesome. I use a Zoom external recorder with mine and they guys I hang out with who use DSLR's all use external mic's anyway. Rode Mic's are a good fit with both the Osmo and DSLR's. The image quality from the small handheld Osmo is really on par with what they get from their DSLR's with big Ronin stabilisers.Would you suggest a DSLR and gimbal for ground work? Was thinking Osmo but you've put me off!
UK
What do u want the obstacle avoidance for? Just wonder what it could possibly help you avoid? It won't detect branches or wires. What do u need help not crashing into??Fair enough, and I agree.
There are really just two things I want. I want the obstacle avoidance, BADLY, but I will have that with the H which I am already definitely getting but I also really want that tracker. If that works, it's a game changer. Even in the test, it doesn't work so great. As someone that tracks objects daily, I can tell you, tracking aint easy and they will never, NEVER get it perfect but i'll take good.
I was so sad when there was no 360 camera cus the les dont go up CRY ;-(- 28 min of flight
- faster then p3p
- little bit better camera
- obstacle avoidance
- autonomus fliying
I've expected little more. There's no big difference between P3P/A and P4.
- 28 min of flight
- faster then p3p
- little bit better camera
- obstacle avoidance
- autonomus fliying
I've expected little more. There's no big difference between P3P/A and P4.
"If" it works like it should then I would hope it stops at least 30% of crashes. Have a look at those drone crash videos and then see how many would have been saved if the drone could detect it was about to run into something.What do u want the obstacle avoidance for? Just wonder what it could possibly help you avoid? It won't detect branches or wires. What do u need help not crashing into??
Sent from my iPhone using PhantomPilots mobile app
Even better, spherical collision avoidance, like a bubble around the aircraft.After just getting a P3P in December I can wait. I will wait till they have collision avoidance 360 degrees.
Two different subjects. There is lens sharpness, and there is post processing to create the jpg or video. The settings you are turning down are post processing. A sharper lens is always better. You can always blur the processing later for effect, but post processing sharpness added to a blurry lens or out of focus image results in that over processed crunchy look you are referring to."Sharper" isn't exactly better. There is a such thing as cameras being too sharp and looking like perfect home videos rather than amazing photos and cinematic videos. I actually turn down the saturation, sharpness and contrast on my P3. It shoots a little too sharp for me.
Aperture is the same on the Phantom 4 as it is on the Phantom 3, which is automatic.
The aperture is not automatic! Its a fixed 2.8. Same as the P3.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.