Don't ask how I know......
I was just going to ask too! lolMan!!!, now I have to ask!! How do you know?
I was flying a Mooney one day and did a few low passes around and near the Boy Scout Camp where my son was camping that weekend. As I flew by, everyone waved except one scout leader off by himself
He seemed to be writing something....yep, my tail number. Turns out, he works for the FAA!! I was charged by the FAA for flying below 1000 feet above an open air assembly of people and careless and reckless flying. Lost my license for 30 days.
It doesn't use a laser does it?Just checking
I'm actually waiting on a range finder to be delivered so I can either confirm or debunk the height.
Take a photo with any structure in the frame. The FAA will take the tail number and the photo, determine actual height and he will likely get from $1000 to $2500 fine.LOL, no, it's primarily used for hunting and has a range of 30 to 600 yards. Give me just a little bit a credit!! I only use the laser off of the bird itself!! (just kidding)![]()
We abort at 1,000' AGL as well. Even then it's too low to do anything but hang on and grunt real hard if the bangs quit banging under the cowl lol.Take a photo with any structure in the frame. The FAA will take the tail number and the photo, determine actual height and he will likely get from $1000 to $2500 fine.
I shoot emergency landings in a particular farm field and I recover at a hard deck limit of 1000 ft AGL. Evidently others do too as I had a Captain ask me if I knew about the pilot hitting the residential power lines at the end of the field..........so people do watch and report.
You should too if as low as you said. If the donkey quits at 400' or lower a 7:1 GS will only get you as far as the crash scene......
I was over the lake, not over the camp. I was at 500 agl. He did not take pic and stated in the paperwork that in his opinion, I was too low to recover in the event of engine failure. The tail number on this particular plane were 12" tall. Easy to read from 500 feet. My unhappiness stemmed from both. I was at 500' agl over a lake and had several options in the event of engine failure. When I argued my case, this guy just laughed and said "Go ahead and fight it! Do you have enough money to fight the FAA?". At that point, I did not. They "negotiated" my charges down to the one month and dropped the careless and reckless.If you were low enough for him to see your tail number (presumably with unaided vision) , and you were low enough to see him writing on a piece of paper....... exactly how low were you? Does your unhappiness stem from getting reported?, or from the penalty you were assessed?
Actually, I've been an AOPA member for 25 years and did have a legal plan. I chose not to go that route due to the $$ and time it would have taken. At the time, I was a private pilot but got my multi and commercial during this period.Your first mistake was not having an AOPA legal plan. The second was responding to the FAA yourself without counsel, I take it you are a private pilot??
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.