- Joined
- Mar 5, 2016
- Messages
- 1,039
- Reaction score
- 289
- Age
- 55
I don't agree, my training has all been over 37 years of owning and building my own RC aircraft, and I'll bet I fly a quad as well, or better then most pilots. I was also told by a couple pilots I should take the test, I would be "solo'ing in no time" due to my "fly by touch" reaction when I took the stick on small aircraft I've actually flown. So for someone who has never seen me fly, to say that just stinks of......well something, I'll put it in prose when I have time to think about how ridiculous your statement is.Very good points. The reason is because if you're only doing it for hobby/recreation back in 2012 Congress pretty much made your untouchable unless you fly in a genuinely unsafe manner. Tack the term "commerce" onto it and the FAA has some degree of authority over the operator. When Congress made "modelers" untouchable in 2012 they had no idea anyone was "really" going to use this technology to make $$ or I'm sure they would have worded things VERY differently than they did.
BINGO! I totally agree. I happen to feel like a great deal of training should be done to simply own one but that's my 2 cents.
I personally don't understand how or why a quad isn't second nature to fly, but that's me, some ppl are just adapt at flying, being a RC helo pilot, plane, or the easiest, a quadcopter. Of course I understand there are those that it isn't as natural, but for me and countless others, flying and doing flight parameters is just simple.
The very first day I had my P3P I was circling my wife and I, in atti mode, while keeping camera pointedly at center, or us, with just a few minutes in the air. I cannot see any reason a seasoned RC guy wouldn't agree with me. Flying an RC and flying a plane where you can at least feel your input have really nothing in common, really, except that they both use the same medium to fly in, after that what they have in common goes down quickly