I agree with everything you said, being the fact that I am technically inclined myself after 35 years of experience. However I have seen these "technical" explanations, theory's or whatever you like to call them stated many times on threads that do not require such detail that many people would not understand. Being that personally I have written many technical documents for training and actual implementation of, for the lack of a better term "Procedures", I feel that there are too many that go too far in explanations to those who are not so inclined. Bottom line is we here in the states used to have a saying......KISS....an acronym for instructional procedures. I know this is a bit winded and I mean no disrespect whatsoever. In fact, I also did training with the RAAF here in the states. I know that is meaningless really but just wanted to toss that out there. I'm not saying that details are not worth saying. I get that. But in most cases, and this one no exception, just rely on KISS. Sorry for the long rant, just IMHO. Peace my Aussie Friend!