- Joined
- Mar 10, 2017
- Messages
- 467
- Reaction score
- 109
- Age
- 64
"In neither case did the airman have the legal authority to shoot down or otherwise disable.."
I would have shot it down and debated the legalese point at leisure.
Bloody idiot .
I think the USAF would use one of the commercially available devices that shoots a net to snarl the drone's props. That would be a lot safer than trying to play "DJI Skeet". It's also why I used the words "the USAF should be allowed to take it down" instead of shooting it down. Getting the drone down intact would make it easier for the authorities to track down the owner.In what world do you think that deploying ordinance is a willy-nilly fashion would be anything other than bloody idiotic?
What, pray tell, do you think you would use? Guns? Yeah, good luck hitting it and those rounds have to go somewhere? Going to get missle lock? Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight....
Rethink calling other people idiots when you make such statements...
I stand by my description of "idiot" to refer to a person who was flying a quadcopter into restricted military airspace. It's a spectacularly dumb thing to do.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.