I thought some of the rumors where that they changed the motors to fix the cracking issue. Not a 100% on that but thats what some are saying on RCGroups.
I thought some of the rumors where that they changed the motors to fix the cracking issue. Not a 100% on that but thats what some are saying on RCGroups.
Not at all.. it's just part of the 305e motor system.. makes more sense to only make 1 motor type than 2 for the same class.
Progression
In case of a small drone like phantom 60g are not bad and your forget that lightbridge and vps need more power as well. You can tell how fast the battery drops on the ground. That is why the standard has 2 minutes more.Ok, so you are just guessing.
Who is saying "significant" ? I would not claim that 7% or 1½ minute is significant in this context.
I would not call 1216 g vs. 1280 g "much" lighter. That is a 5% diff...
Of course will a more efficient motor consume less energy for the same job. That is what efficiency means in this context.
If you have the white plastic motor clamp than you have the newer revision, old was from sheet metal. The old motors had harsh edges when you look at that "star" from above, the new ones are rounded with no edges.For the record, I just received a brand new P3 advanced today and it has the new Panasonic SD card. Not sure how to tell if the motors are the new model? Ive never owned a phantom before.
Yeah with the standard and non aggresive flying or hovering.I'm getting close to 28 min. On the new motors.......
If you have the white plastic motor clamp than you have the newer revision, old was from sheet metal. The old motors had harsh edges when you look at that "star" from above, the new ones are rounded with no edges.
I mean the tool that comes with your phantom, is it plastic or metal?Ah ok, I still have the old motors then
You Know what you do with these?
View attachment 27504
If your using these your wrecking your props!!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.