What I find most interesting about this proposed iD and telemetry acquisition proposal is in one of the claims, specifically that it will operate for all DJI AC. Ther have been numerous discussions here and elsewhere concerning how diffenent “lightbridge” and “occusync” are to conventional wifi and to a lesser extent how good the encryption is that is said to be employed in later DJI firmwares. The fact it is seemingly possible to recover the subject data from all AC brings the validity of a lot of what has been thought and argued concerning the DJI transmission protocols into question. It is more likely than not that all products use wifi with the wifibroadcast protocol being employed in the lightbridge and occusync equipped models. I also wonder if the proposed hardware might inadvertently acquire and log data from non DJI wifi services and wah assurances might be given around the possible use of this data.
All conventional wifi communications should be encrypted in a way that prevents 3rd party eavesdropping. DJI monitoring equipment may be able to listen to DJI aircraft, but they won't be able to decrypt other wifi traffic.