Doesn't the FAA require line of sight flying (as does the UK CAA)? If you have poor LOS shouldn't you be flying somewhere else? Just asking.
Not yet. Its only a recommendation along with the 400' alt limit.
Doesn't the FAA require line of sight flying (as does the UK CAA)? If you have poor LOS shouldn't you be flying somewhere else? Just asking.
Not to open a can of worms, but "line of sight" is a poorly understood term. Strictly speaking, LOS does NOT actually require you to be able to see your copter, although it is generally a good idea to be able to see it while flying. Can anyone really see their phantom when it is 3000-4000 feet away?
Depending on how you look at it Line of site can be a LONG way.
Ground station missions need to be flown first, and way points marked manually during the flight. The mission can be named and saved and reflown later. Discuss.
Yeah. There's some confusion between waypoints and ground station. The former is exactly what this is, the latter implies setting the mission from the ground station. This way is definitely a cover-your-*** implementation.That is what I heard.
That has its merits for some but not going to work for a lot of people !
I think that is just a poor translation. I wouldn't even guess as to what they are trying to say.DJI creators?..what does that mean beta testers?
I am anxious to see it. I know what the current SDK will do and am quite pleased with missions using Litchi.Yeah. There's some confusion between waypoints and ground station. The former is exactly what this is, the latter implies setting the mission from the ground station. This way is definitely a cover-your-*** implementation.
I think for this specific function, the GO app will probably be pretty good, other than having to fly the mission manually to create the waypoints.I am anxious to see it. I know what the current SDK will do and am quite pleased with missions using Litchi.
If the Go App has a quicker method of doing a cable cam I might try it as Litchi has not implemented full camera adjustment/control yet.
I was talking with my son about all this news at lunch today - first words out of his mouth were, "wonder what distance limits they will place on the waypoint flying?" I had figured there would be no limits...obviously the limits will involve maintaining a clean connection to the controller - certainly not autonomous flight which is often equated as waypoint flying. If this were the case (limited by a connection to the controller) it would be great since so many of us can fly way yonder beyond the 3K distances if we want to. However, I suspect the limit will be much closer than that....hope I'm wrong.Just wait till you see the distance limitations on waypoints! I doubt anyone will be happy!
Are you talking about the SDK or the Go app? It was my understanding either the Go App range was really limited or you had to maintain connectivity ?The limitations have nothing to do with connectivity. The "mission" is uploaded to the P3, and then executed. Technically, the controller could be shut off and you could go have a beer while its out flying.
But wouldn't that be taking chances with a DWI??
Seriously, so in this case if you are correct, it is autonomous flight.
I'm speaking from the BETA perspective. And specifically the App. Litchi and AutoPilot have both far better waypoint implementation. But I think that's the case because DJI is playing the safe role, which totally makes sense. They have a huge liability issue, where 3rd party developers have almost none.Are you talking about the SDK or the Go app? It was my understanding either the Go App range was really limited or you had to maintain connectivity ?
Doesn't the FAA require line of sight flying (as does the UK CAA)? If you have poor LOS shouldn't you be flying somewhere else? Just asking.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.