- Joined
- Dec 4, 2016
- Messages
- 563
- Reaction score
- 310
- Age
- 50
The Mavic Air is awesomePeople, let’s be nice and also stay on topic which is Mavic Air in this thread
My Air should arrive today. One of the things I'm super excited about is the on-drone stitching of 36 megapixel panoramic images. That link that YoshiK1 posted a few pages back with that panorama of the glacier is actually AMAZING for a drone like this. I kid you not, I sat staring at that image with GOOSE BUMPS all over my body.
For landscape photographers the MP size isn't a show-stopper because you take four 12 MP images and stitch them together in a wide panorama and you now have a much higher MP image from a perspective that's very difficult and costly to get from a DSLR. I shot this a few weeks ago, three stitched images, and the source file is 14,000 pixels wide. Plenty good for wall sized prints. The Mavic Air is going to get me some nice images and rather high quality 4K 100mbps video for the price of a super cheap DSLR, and it'll fit in my pocket? You guys can be as negative as you want, but I'm going to be capturing 10x more images now than I would with my P4P because this little drone is going to ALWAYS be with me (assuming it actually works, unlike my Phantom 2 which literally didn't get me even one good flight it was so buggy, and the P4Pro which was terribly buggy as well the first month). I'm praying they got the bugs worked out (BEFORE shipping this time) so that I can take it out this weekend and actually enjoy it.
P4P. Thanks! The full res image is gob-smacking beautiful. I love that drone. Can't wait for the P5P. My Mavic Air has arrived, and it is in a whole new league from a design standpoint. Up til now the only really elegant drone DJI has designed is the Inspire. But this Air is truly inspirational in both form and function. The design team on this really outdid themselves. Haven't flown it yet, I need to finish a rush job in the studio before I can get out and do anything with it. But I've already lost weight from the amount of drool I've emitted staring at it. The Fly More Bundle is definitely worth the money guys, the extras it comes with are fantastic. And get yourself the fold-able helipad... really cool. I'm taking it out for 3 or 4 days of dedicated shooting once this project is out of my hair.
I've just watched the Mavic Air launch on screen.
I'm an experienced professional, with three of my six titles being coffee-table books. Two are filled with top-quality wildlife and natural landscape images. Whereas I'm not keen on the label of "adventure photographer", I've worked in countries such as Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia, Bangladesh, and Nepal - plus more common destinations such as Tanzania, Kenya, Namibia, South Africa, India, Australia, and the US - always in remote locations. And you can add five films from years ago (Ethiopia, South Africa x2, Australia, plus the UK).
Today's presentation was slick and well done (with the exception of the "landscape" props which were tacky). And it could have been slightly better if the main presenter had put on an Obi-wan Kenobi cloak/hood for his demonstration of mind/hand control of the drone on stage.
Importantly, this drone is another step forward in technology.
But would someone like myself realistically choose this new drone? "No" is my considered answer, simply because the images/video it can produce are a step backwards when compared to the P4P's capability. We waited until the P4P was released and road-tested before adding a drone as a work tool.
Yes, it's compact. And in a very few situations this would be a decisive factor. But in most situations, the P4P's size and weight is small/light enough. Major film crews carry enormous amounts of equipment, and smaller operators are not shy of packing whatever is necessary to get the job done. I work closely with my fantastic wife. A tough head ranger in the Scottish Highlands affectionately called her "Pack Horse" because of what she was carrying - which included a heavy Manfrotto tripod, two camera bodies, and a big Nikon wildlife lens. Strap on an additional backpack to the front of her body containing the P4P and she wouldn't complain.
When it comes to still images and film, quality matters. The bar is set high and you only accept lower in certain circumstances, such as for inclusion in a here-today-gone-tomorrow news story. I doubt too many Limited Edition Prints will be made and sold, for example, from using a Mavic Air.
I appreciate that many on this forum are drone enthusiasts and I don't want to be offensive in any way. But today's launch featured a young adventure photographer as a selling point. Whereas this was a good marketing ploy, it will be viewed somewhat sceptically by experienced professionals like myself (with the few exceptions as noted above). The P4P is already relative small in size and light in weight compared to other drones able to offer quality output. Why would we want to go backwards?
YoshiK1,
Wow, two new drones within two weeks? Nice! I wish I could afford the Inspire 2 with the X7 camera, that's a dream setup. But alas, I just can't justify it yet. Hopefully this little Air satisfies my drone cravings, cuz the P4P is just too bulky to carry everywhere I want to fly. I'll know soon enough. Tomorrow morning is the maiden.
Thanks, Craig, (as well as others), because my simple points have been misunderstood by a few people. I can’t praise DJI high enough for their drones, for whatever purpose or target customer, but their slick presentation launch did become misleading when they involved a working “adventure” photographer. The Mavic Air is not - and will not become - a tool for professionals in most instances. By comparison, the P4P is just good enough. I’m 61 years of age in a few days, highly experienced, commonly in remote locations overseas, and know exactly what can be carried.Thanks. I agree with you 100%
Mm, that's a tough one. If I had to choose between the Air and P4P, the Phantom would win hands down in my mind. That drone is a super-star IMO. Maybe the Air will win me over with it's convenience though, who knows. I have some tough choices coming up with several international trips where the Air would be just so convenient and the P4P a real pain to haul around, but I know I'd get far superior stills & video with the P4Pro. It's gonna be an agonizing decision. Really it just boils down to whether you're doing paying work, or goofing off. I'd never use a selfie drone for pro work, the P4P barely qualifies as a pro rig. I agree with African Wildlife on that matter. But when I'm just doing personal hobby or family shots, or doing some daring-do, I'm hoping the Air will be enough to satisfy and help me keep my P4P in good shape for the paying work.
4k 60fps is a completely unrealistic expectation for any consumer drone. Can I ask what you need 60 fps for?
Well, the verdict is in for me. This little drone is a pretty amazing piece of tech, but the grain noise levels are high even in good lighting, the focus is soft, the color is a bit off, and it just doesn't compare to the P4Pro. The problem for me is that I'm completely spoiled by the P4Pro image and video quality. Taking this big of a step back in image quality is hard. That's not a fault of the design or of the Mavic Air, it's just a function of Apples & Oranges, and a function of "you get what you pay for" value. Nobody should be expecting Phantom quality images out of a tiny drone like this. I don't, but I'll admit I was sort of hoping.
I had a heart attack when I reviewed my first flights because the first three videos were completely garbled. Badly garbled. I'm like "Crap, I got a Lemon". I recorded those to the internal storage, not an SD card. But I went into the settings and formatted the internal storage, the next set of videos seemed to be okay. The Air wouldn't read my Phantom formatted SD card, I had to reformat it in the drone.
When I first saw the Mavic Pro video quality from a friend's drone, it immediately turned me off of buying one. That experience is what caused me to go up to the P4Pro, and it was a good choice. I think the Mavic Air is a bit of a step up in compression quality from the Mavic Pro, but I think it might be a step down in lens quality. It's just really soft. Doing a sharpness grade in post helps a TON, but that only goes so far. Where it's fixed focus, there's nothing you can do but just deal with whatever focus quality you get.
Crazy incredible technology is packed in this little drone. It's a design wonder. I've only tested it at home so far, I'll get a better feel for it after I've flown it in the field for a few days. The noise level is significantly more noticable than the Mavic Pro or Platinum, not just for volume, but for pitch. The whine really stands out and the sound travels. So it's not as stealthy.
But dang it folds up small and packs light! Love that so much.
Dlog does not work well for any of the drones that do not support raw footage currently (essentially all below the Inspire series). 8 bit is simply not enough for dlog (allows for 256 shades) and you end up with aliasing and banding in monotone highlight areas such as a clear sky.Is it safe to assume that Cinelike-D and D-Log are two different things? Lack of a logarithmic recording mode would seem to me to be an intentional move to separate the consumer and prosumer products.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.