There are some minor issues when we tested our CH7 enabler on 3.06. We have been working a fix or workaround for it.Mori55 said:Any channel 7 updates ?
srandall25 said:Anyone using FPVLR Stage 2 (pinwheel & half sphere antenna) with the wifi range extender and FPV booster app? I tested this setup for the first time today and left a little confused... Here is why...
Tizz110 who has a lot of long distance flying experience informed me that he routinely achieves around 10,000 feet on a stock wifi range extender with only using the booster app. So I figured, ok, if I use the booster app along with this Stage 2 setup, I should have very good FPV streaming within this range. Today I flew out to 3,000 feet and then the FPV started getting really grainy and experiencing video delays.. It wasn't smooth.. and worried me enough that I flew it back. I tried another time with the same results...
After flying with 5 batteries today, I noticed my range extender was at 20% battery power. I started at 100%. I've never depleted the battery this much on 5 battery use with the booster app. Therefore, I concluded that the two new antennas were putting an additional drain on the battery. Not a big deal, just a realization. Then I thought, I wonder if my long range antenna (the 9dBi half sphere helix) is actually under performing over the stock configuration since I now have two higher gain antennas hanging off the same power source with no additional amplification. I'm actually considering going back to a stock wifi range extender after this experience. If someone like Tizz110 is routinely getting 10,000 with a stock wifi extender and booster app, I'm not sure how I'm benefiting from putting these additional bulky antennas on my range extender...
Your thoughts??
p.s. I'm using the latest firmware and version app...
I suggest to test your antenna mod without using booster app in open area, and identify the issue.srandall25 said:Anyone using FPVLR Stage 2 (pinwheel & half sphere antenna) with the wifi range extender and FPV booster app? I tested this setup for the first time today and left a little confused... Here is why...
Tizz110 who has a lot of long distance flying experience informed me that he routinely achieves around 10,000 feet on a stock wifi range extender with only using the booster app. So I figured, ok, if I use the booster app along with this Stage 2 setup, I should have very good FPV streaming within this range. Today I flew out to 3,000 feet and then the FPV started getting really grainy and experiencing video delays.. It wasn't smooth.. and worried me enough that I flew it back. I tried another time with the same results...
After flying with 5 batteries today, I noticed my range extender was at 20% battery power. I started at 100%. I've never depleted the battery this much on 5 battery use with the booster app. Therefore, I concluded that the two new antennas were putting an additional drain on the battery. Not a big deal, just a realization. Then I thought, I wonder if my long range antenna (the 9dBi half sphere helix) is actually under performing over the stock configuration since I now have two higher gain antennas hanging off the same power source with no additional amplification. I'm actually considering going back to a stock wifi range extender after this experience. If someone like Tizz110 is routinely getting 10,000 with a stock wifi extender and booster app, I'm not sure how I'm benefiting from putting these additional bulky antennas on my range extender...
Your thoughts??
p.s. I'm using the latest firmware and version app...
How rare is it to have a bad pigtail ? They look and feel solid... If they were bad, would I have still achieved 3000 ft?PVFlyer said:I suggest to test your antenna mod without using booster app in open area, and identify the issue.srandall25 said:Anyone using FPVLR Stage 2 (pinwheel & half sphere antenna) with the wifi range extender and FPV booster app? I tested this setup for the first time today and left a little confused... Here is why...
Tizz110 who has a lot of long distance flying experience informed me that he routinely achieves around 10,000 feet on a stock wifi range extender with only using the booster app. So I figured, ok, if I use the booster app along with this Stage 2 setup, I should have very good FPV streaming within this range. Today I flew out to 3,000 feet and then the FPV started getting really grainy and experiencing video delays.. It wasn't smooth.. and worried me enough that I flew it back. I tried another time with the same results...
After flying with 5 batteries today, I noticed my range extender was at 20% battery power. I started at 100%. I've never depleted the battery this much on 5 battery use with the booster app. Therefore, I concluded that the two new antennas were putting an additional drain on the battery. Not a big deal, just a realization. Then I thought, I wonder if my long range antenna (the 9dBi half sphere helix) is actually under performing over the stock configuration since I now have two higher gain antennas hanging off the same power source with no additional amplification. I'm actually considering going back to a stock wifi range extender after this experience. If someone like Tizz110 is routinely getting 10,000 with a stock wifi extender and booster app, I'm not sure how I'm benefiting from putting these additional bulky antennas on my range extender...
Your thoughts??
p.s. I'm using the latest firmware and version app...
FYI, our booster app does not boost RE, and your antenna mod should not drain extra battery. You may try to swap 2 pigtails connecting to antennas. I suspect you might get bad pigtail cables.
cool, thanks. just sent him a PM...Mori55 said:I would ask Tony on the fpvlr thread. I remember easing about some low quality pigtails.
srandall25 said:cool, thanks. just sent him a PM...Mori55 said:I would ask Tony on the fpvlr thread. I remember easing about some low quality pigtails.
What color? you're talking the end that connects to the board right? it was a gold plated connector.tizzl10 said:srandall25 said:cool, thanks. just sent him a PM...Mori55 said:I would ask Tony on the fpvlr thread. I remember easing about some low quality pigtails.
what color are your pigtails? I highly doubt it's a pigtail issue because you are still getting 3,000 feet. if it were a pigtail issue, he wouldn't get that far, IMO. This is simply the case of mismatched antennas.
like a pinkish color i guess...tizzl10 said:no, the color of the pigtail wire itself.
the reason I ask is because the thin, black ones are crap..the thicker pink ones are the good ones.
I suspect this because if the pinwheel pigtail work but 9dbi helical pigtail not working, then 3000ft is reasonable. Thus I suggest to swap 2 antennas for easy testing.tizzl10 said:srandall25 said:cool, thanks. just sent him a PM...Mori55 said:I would ask Tony on the fpvlr thread. I remember easing about some low quality pigtails.
what color are your pigtails? I highly doubt it's a pigtail issue because you are still getting 3,000 feet. if it were a pigtail issue, he wouldn't get that far, IMO. This is simply the case of mismatched antennas.
tizzl10 said:srandall25 said:Anyone using FPVLR Stage 2 (pinwheel & half sphere antenna) with the wifi range extender and FPV booster app? I tested this setup for the first time today and left a little confused... Here is why...
Tizz110 who has a lot of long distance flying experience informed me that he routinely achieves around 10,000 feet on a stock wifi range extender with only using the booster app. So I figured, ok, if I use the booster app along with this Stage 2 setup, I should have very good FPV streaming within this range. Today I flew out to 3,000 feet and then the FPV started getting really grainy and experiencing video delays.. It wasn't smooth.. and worried me enough that I flew it back. I tried another time with the same results...
After flying with 5 batteries today, I noticed my range extender was at 20% battery power. I started at 100%. I've never depleted the battery this much on 5 battery use with the booster app. Therefore, I concluded that the two new antennas were putting an additional drain on the battery. Not a big deal, just a realization. Then I thought, I wonder if my long range antenna (the 9dBi half sphere helix) is actually under performing over the stock configuration since I now have two higher gain antennas hanging off the same power source with no additional amplification. I'm actually considering going back to a stock wifi range extender after this experience. If someone like Tizz110 is routinely getting 10,000 with a stock wifi extender and booster app, I'm not sure how I'm benefiting from putting these additional bulky antennas on my range extender...
Your thoughts??
p.s. I'm using the latest firmware and version app...
ahhh..yes, you are experiencing the same issue I had when I installed my full disk helix on my old Phantom Vision. The issue here is mixing of antennas. The helix antennas are LHCP 2.4ghz (left hand circular polarization) while the stock phantom wifi antennas are linearly polarized, thus creating a mismatch. Your best bet at this point is to either add LHCP pinwheel antennas to the phantom to match the helix or go back to the stock extender antennas.
srandall25 said:Does it make sense that this antenna mismatch would still under-perform than the stock extender with booster app? I would have thought that even with the antenna mismatch, my 9dBi Sphere Helix with booster app would perform better than the stock extender w/booster app...
RemE said:I don't see it as a problem with the Vision and Vision+ as they have left hand polarized patch antennas for their WiFi video link. The helical which was made left hand to match Visions should be fine. Even if it were not, there is only a 3db loss between circular to linear antennas if the Vision was linear polarized which I'm pretty sure it's not.
The only really bad mismatch is between right hand and left hand circulars and between vertical and horizontal linear polarized antennas, something to avoid at all costs.
I vote for a bad pigtail or noisy RF enviornment in your area.
The 5.8Ghz is linear polarized so many of us have changed the TX to a RPSMA connector as well and added an 11db linear patch which seems to work great and is very compact.
tizzl10 said:RemE said:I don't see it as a problem with the Vision and Vision+ as they have left hand polarized patch antennas for their WiFi video link. The helical which was made left hand to match Visions should be fine. Even if it were not, there is only a 3db loss between circular to linear antennas if the Vision was linear polarized which I'm pretty sure it's not.
The only really bad mismatch is between right hand and left hand circulars and between vertical and horizontal linear polarized antennas, something to avoid at all costs.
I vote for a bad pigtail or noisy RF enviornment in your area.
The 5.8Ghz is linear polarized so many of us have changed the TX to a RPSMA connector as well and added an 11db linear patch which seems to work great and is very compact.
I beg to differ..do you have this setup? what are your wifi ranges?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.