Spend some time thinking about that, licensing is not rules. I don't need a license to tell me that the rule (if there were one) says I can't go above 400 AGL.I disagree. Just because people break rules, doesn't mean there shouldn't be rules.
Spend some time thinking about that, licensing is not rules. I don't need a license to tell me that the rule (if there were one) says I can't go above 400 AGL.I disagree. Just because people break rules, doesn't mean there shouldn't be rules.
Making people go through a certification process hits home the responsibility of what they're doing as well as educating them on the proper use of their aircraft. Why I have to explain the necessity for this is beyond me... but it will happen. We're just at the dawn of a new age. There were no driver's licenses when cars first became popular either. Eventually people said: "woah, we might need to set up some guidelines here..."Spend some time thinking about that, licensing is not rules. I don't need a license to tell me that the rule (if there were one) says I can't go above 400 AGL.
Ohh, I thought it was all about making money. Darn, I was wrong again, all those roads came out of nowhere for free.Making people go through a certification process hits home the responsibility of what they're doing as well as educating them on the proper use of their aircraft. Why I have to explain the necessity for this is beyond me... but it will happen. We're just at the dawn of a new age. There were no driver's licenses when cars first became popular either. Eventually people said: "woah, we might need to set up some guidelines here..."
Ohh, I thought it was all about making money. Darn, I was wrong again, all those roads came out of nowhere for free.
This @#%!% guy...Nope. I never learned how to drive from the test or licensing. I actually learned to drive when I was 11 on my own.
My mom was talking to one of the DMV road test officials while I was out on my road test. The official told her that I would fail 100% guaranteed, because the official I was driving with never in 20 years passed his first driver of the day. I didn't fail, and if I did I'd probably get that official fired.This @#%!% guy...
You fail to realize only responsible people get licensed, therefore no significant improvement is made. Similar to how CHL holders very rarely cause any crime but gun crimes happen anyway.Making people go through a certification process hits home the responsibility of what they're doing as well as educating them on the proper use of their aircraft. Why I have to explain the necessity for this is beyond me... but it will happen. We're just at the dawn of a new age. There were no driver's licenses when cars first became popular either. Eventually people said: "woah, we might need to set up some guidelines here..."
Ok... Here's my well thought out response.
Ok... Under MODEL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS, I see:
Individuals flying for hobby or recreation are strongly encouraged to follow safety guidelines, which include:
Same stuff as we've all been 'advised to follow'. NOT 'required'.
- Fly below 400 feet and remain clear of surrounding obstacles
Done. The Pirker case you speak of was SETTLED, not ruled on in court and also relates to COMMERCIAL DRONE USE. NOT Hobby use.
Based on your #3 Can you please site specific cases numbers we can review?
How did someone complain about an elevation so far beyond the human eye no one could possibly see it? Are FAA complaints public domain? Who was the complaint against? How did the complainant know who the person was and how did the FAA know he was a member of phantompilots? More importantly, how do you know? If you know, tell us who? Surely this type of complaint to our government is public domain information. Police logs are published in the new papers... this should be public domain as well.
The reason we're ganging up is because many of your points, as I point out, do not hold water or are unrelated. If you care to comment on my responses, it might help your cause. None of the content relates to our use or is backed by any evidence or examples of how and where this mystery law has been enforced or even tried.
I looked up the Pirker case.
Here is an interesting part of one of the articles about it.
"When I first started covering Pirker's case, media and just about everyone else took the FAA's word that commercial drone flights were illegal. Since then, the agency has been exposed, over and over, as making up quasi-legal "regulations" as it goes along. And still, we have no small drone rule, after one was promised, over and over again, by the end of 2014."
So i guess that takes care of that.
I would like to know what aircrafts fly in the 400'-1000' AGL?
Typical 737 climb rate is 1,800-2,200 fpm and we have restrictions around airports.
Glide path is obviously lower, but still, way above 400' until very last bit of final approach.
Medical & law enforcement helicopters also fly in the 2,000' AGL range.
Lastly, do you know what the statistical probability is of striking a one cubic foot UAV with another aircraft?
Yes, I realize that it could theoretically happen and why chance it.
But this is not like winning a lottery or getting hit by a lightning.
I could run the numbers, but there are so many variables.
NY ADC Law 10-126
You are obviously misguided. Nothing to do with anything here. After skimming that law/rule whatever it is, your not allowed to have helium balloons, no blimps, no news copters, I would go as far as to say that NYPD on the side of the helicopter is considered advertising. All AMA clubs are illegal, kites. Airlines shouldn't be flying here as they are advertising, that sea plane that lands and takes off from the east river is definitely illegal and all the copters that land and take off at seaport are illegal.
If so, please send me the address to where I can send my complaints. I will send you at least 100 per day.
You are here just to waste peoples time.
You're kind of asking for this Govman.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.