ianwood said:Ultralights are fully relevant. It's a flying machine that goes further and higher than a Phantom can and requires nothing from the FAA. SteveMann, thanks for bringing up that example. It highlights a duality.
The FAA is proposing you need a pilot's license to operate a sub 5lb quadcopter even if you never operate above 400ft. And yet to strap a lawnmower on my back and cruise around at several thousand feet, I need nothing.
Actually a very good example. I agree.
There are strict operating limitations imposed by the FAA and designed to limit the dangers to the non-participant. (You are permitted to risk your own neck.)
1. No passengers allowed
2 No flying over towns or settlements
3. No flying at night or above (or in) the clouds
4. No flying in airspace around airports with control towers and certain other airspace without prior permission.
5. No commercial operations (for hire) except instruction.
6. Ultralights must yield right-of-way to ALL OTHER AIRCRAFT.
7. No! You don't have to have a pilots license (yet).
Yup, the same restrictions we face. And if you have a two seat Ultralight, you do have to have an LSA license.
Does the FAA investigate and fine those who don't follow the rules? You betcha.
Google my old buddy Dell Schanze! He is probably the most FAA investigated and fined UL pilot out there: Launching from landmarks, buzzing people, buzzing the interstate, kicking owl in flight, buzzing tour boats, etc.