Yip ZT nailed it what a [EXPLETIVE REMOVED] ,water canon sound good,
Demand the evidence
=======================================================================........................
Do remember this is the day and age of "regulation by media"......... If they can get the general public behind them (government), every drone in the country (except for military, police, and fire) will be grounded. Don't fall for the hoopla!!! ......... The rope will tighten...and won't loosen...ever. (i.e. gun laws, search and seizure, freedom of speech, etc etc etc).........I work in the aviation industry on helicopters to this day, and have yet to be told by one of my fellow pilots or crew members that a drone has hampered their day in any form...yet...........Demand the evidence
I think we make a mistake thinking some drone flyer is out having his jollys in a situation like this. I'd say the higher probability could well be a concerned homeowner fearful of where the fire is and flying a drone to get a view. Just saying things aren't always what they seem. Of course, said homeowner is in the wrong, but then fear is a powerful force.
-- zigs
I disagree. We had exactly the same situation over a wildfire here last week, shutting down all aerial operations for over an hour. The local homeowners had all been evacuated and, in any case, were the last people likely to jeopardize the firefighting effort by flying a drone. I'd say most likely it was flown to get "cool" video and photos of the fire.
=============================================I think we make a mistake thinking some drone flyer is out having his jollys in a situation like this. I'd say the higher probability could well be a concerned homeowner fearful of where the fire is and flying a drone to get a view. Just saying things aren't always what they seem. Of course, said homeowner is in the wrong, but then fear is a powerful force.
-- zigs
We won't know in this case unless they find the perpetrator. My only point is don't jump to conclusions about the motivation that drives people to do things. Without perspective it's hard to come to reasonable conclusions and solutions. Over generalization is our enemy in the long run.
Actually, I stated "the higher probability." Hopefully, you're not a gambling man. ;-)It's fine to argue for not jumping to conclusions, and yet you promptly concluded, with no supporting argument, that it was a homeowner flying a drone to track the fire. I'm not jumping to conclusions either - I'm arguing that it is not the most likely explanation.
Actually, I stated "the higher probability." Hopefully, you're not a gambling man. ;-)
Although not about THIS exact fire, here's some video evidence of some kind of UAS in the restricted area:
Video released showing drone threatening crews over Cajete Fire
Although not about THIS exact fire, here's some video evidence of some kind of UAS in the restricted area:
Video released showing drone threatening crews over Cajete Fire
That guy needs a better potato to record video.
I have a problem with the news station and the way they reported it. How was it threatening the crews? Was it going up to them and telling them it was going to kick their asses? It was interfering with the operation. But hey, that's the modus operandi of the media now, spread fear and hate and keep the ignorant misinformed. Sensationalism sells.
If they just did a drop on the UAV it will end that right away. I'm pretty sure a few thousand gallons of water will bring it down.
Once again, they used a Phantom as the example, and not the "orange cylindrical shaped drone" that was spotted.
Also, not near as much mentioning of the campfire that wasn't put out, but more about the illegal quad.
Still though, I hope they find the quad operator and "drag him through the coals"!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.