That's because he's good......saltire said:That video is super smooth very impressed.

Takes an awful smooth stick, and a lot of practice to shoot like that. Filming with the Phantom is a lot harder than it looks.
That's because he's good......saltire said:That video is super smooth very impressed.
ghinson said:I'm not a long-ranger, but I thought you guys could help me problem solve a short-range problem.
P2nV. IRC600 to BP monitor (with OSD).
When I first started using this FPV, I got 300-350m before losing some video and seeing static.
I changed to channel 3 (5780 I think) and it was a little better. Could go 400-500m.
Now. Even though this is just fine with me--I like to keep my eye on my investment--I bought the IB crazy Bluebeams (these: http://www.readymaderc.com/store/index. ... ef6b143098) and installed them today for a first flight.
Unfortunately, I was breaking up now at 200-250m.
Today's flight was in the same location, same time of day as yesterday's with the stock antennae taking me out over 400m for sure.
Any thoughts as to what I might've done wrong.
Did put the right-hand connector one on the Tx and the straight on one of my BP receiver posts, leaving the stock one on the other.
Thanks for your help.
The SMA Male ends will have pins sticking out of them(on the antenna connectors themselves). If you look into the antenna and see a hole, that's RP-SMA.ghinson said:Looking at the package (from Video Aerial Systems), says 5.8 GHz, Blue Beam Antenna Set. (Ultra).
"Contains 1 transmitter antenna, 1 receiver antenna. Foxtech, Boscam ... [etc] ... will require an RP-SMA female to SMA female adapter."
That's all it says.
The two antenna came as a matched pair, so I assume it's the right ones.
How can I know?
Yep-it means both are SMA, so you're fine. You wouldn't even be able to screw on the antenna, if it was RP-SMA.ghinson said:Both antenna are male.
And the IRC600 Tx and the BP monitor both have holes.
Is that not how it should be?
Does it matter which stock antenna (of the two) I replace on the BP monitor? Does it matter than the two are now different?
I can experiment with different channels and placement and see if it makes a difference.
Doesn't matter if the antenna is on #1 or #2 on the receiver. You should see the light on the bottom that tells you which antenna the receiver is using.ghinson said:The online page says put the 3 mushroom 90 deg one on the transmitter and the 5 mushroom straight one on the receiver. But I can switch as a trial.
Wondering about the two antenna that come with the BP receiver. Right and left. I only have one of these IBCrazys for the receiver, so I left the stock antenna on the other one. Can't imagine it would matter if it was on the right or left plug. Right?
I got these because a friend uses them locally and has had good luck flying them (with goggles instead of the Black Pearl) to 1500M.
I'll try different frequencies this afternoon. THANKS.
leekawey said:The absolute distance thing is interesting but really its all about 1 to 2K max which allows you some loitering time to film the intended subject.
https://vimeo.com/89261570
thongbong said:soo..... after making my own CP antenna, I decided to make a homebrew 7 turn helical... and results... I will never buy a premade one again. The furthest I flew was about 1400m at 250m, with a little breakup on the turnaround--this was in my suburb. Would have like to gone further but would have taken me too far out into the city. When I have a chance to fly in a nice open countryside, I'll have more results.
I definitely encourage everyone to try to build your own, if you have a soldering iron. Plenty of tutorials to be found on youtube.![]()
thongbong said:I definitely encourage everyone to try to build your own, if you have a soldering iron. Plenty of tutorials to be found on youtube.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.