From early times Americans have shown a propensity to see what isn't there if it's scary and talked about.
Think witches at Salem 1692 or reds under beds in the late 1940s and 1950s or a million UFO reports.
The brain can be convinced that it sees something quite different from what it is observing.
The quality of some of the unsubstantiated drone reports to have come out make it pretty clear that some of these things pilots are reporting aren't the things we are flying. I'm puzzled that the reports are for all colours and so few that fit the standard description of a Phantom.
Here are a few of the more obviously dodgy reports ..
...a drone or possible large balloon with anti-collision white lights
...a “disk-like” drone passing within 20 to 40 feet of the aircraft while at 3,000 feet
...“taking evasive action” to avoid a small drone at 4,800 feet. The pilot said the two-foot-wide black drone, with a camera attached
...a drone at an altitude of 800 feet, flying circles around the police aircraft
...Drone described as three feet tall and with a two-foot-wide rotor on top
...a yellow drone with a four-foot wingspan passing within 50 feet of the aircraft at an altitude of 4,000 feet
...a traffic-collision alert system warning after coming within 500 to 1,000 feet of a drone
Who knows what these pilots really saw? But it's a safe bet that not all of them are drones.
For an intelligent insight into the report rather than the usual panic, Forbes says this ...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngoglia/ ... you-think/