knuckles said:I guess the FAA has finally caught up on processing and approving those hundreds of 333 exemptions they have been years behind on that they have so much free time to eat Doritos and surf YouTube.
Yeah I know it just seems like years for those that submittedSilentAV8R said:knuckles said:I guess the FAA has finally caught up on processing and approving those hundreds of 333 exemptions they have been years behind on that they have so much free time to eat Doritos and surf YouTube.
Just for the sake of accuracy, the FAA only started approving Section 333 waivers in the fall of 2014. .
I do not disagree with any of the posts, but the FAA-speak for commercial use is "holding out".steveeds said:As far as I thought "commercial use" had to have both parties in agreement, basically it's a non enforceable non legal agreement, I could be wrong, this is not an unusual thing.
physically holding out without advertising where a reputation to serve all is gained is sufficient to constitute an offer to carry all customers. There are many means by which physical holding out may take place. For example, the expression of willingness to all customers with whom contact is made that the operator can and will perform the requested service is sufficient. The fact that the holding out generates little success is of no consequence. The nature and character of the operation are the important issue.