I would stay away from carbom fiber props. Im sure If they have an advantage, DJI would install them on all the phantoms.
I don't agree with your theory. They appear to form 4 discs but in reality most of the space is open to sky in time frame. I feel like laughing at the discussion. If you are not convinced, direct two laser beams on to the top of the P3 from different angles when props are rotating, show me a place where laser beams can't reach the top of the p3. And in reality, GPS signals are not just one or two sharp beams, they are spread all over.The satellite signals do not all come down vertically! Some are bound to come through the arc of the props. If the props reflect GPS signals it could cause problems.
Don't just get confused by the appearance in the above picture, it's safe to use DJI cf props.Great discovery. I was going to get some DJI CF props mostly for the colour. But now I'll pass. Thanks
I don't agree with your theory. They appear to form 4 discs but in reality most of the space is open to sky in time frame. I feel like laughing at the discussion. If you are not convinced, direct a laser beam on to the top of the P3 from different angles when props are rotating, show me a place where laser beam can't reach the top of the p3. And in reality, GPS signals are not a sharp beam, they are spread all over.
I use DJI cf props and never had any issue.
Sorry if I hurt your feelings but I had a real big smile when I read it. Didn't laugh at you, laughed at the analogy being proposed.Laugh away!
Ever heard of multipath interference?
Windfarms have been known to cause scatter which effects radar and gps signals amongst others.
I am NOT saying this is the cause - just a slim possibility. I always try to keep an open mind and not laugh at other people's ideas.
The satellite signals do not all come down vertically! Some are bound to come through the arc of the props. If the props reflect GPS signals it could cause problems.
And what's makes anyone think a spinning propeller would affect the GPS signal anyway?
The signal makes it 12,500 miles from space, through our atmosphere, and it's stopped by a couple millimeters of plastic? No doubt it attenuates the signal some small amount, but the spinning has nothing at all to do with it. In fact, the spinning reduces the amount of time that the propeller is in the path of the signal. Look at the shadow behind a fan. Does the shadow appears at all to be "blown" by the movement of the blades?
GPS signal = radio waves = light.
In addition, the GPS itself is doing tons of calculations and taking into account multi-path all sorts of other interference. And it does a pretty good job too. My P3P with dji CRP props is absolutely stable at hover, without any VPS help. As is the same for countless others.
That all said....
1) This is a total red herring, and we should move on from this thread
2) Only use official DJI props
For anyone interested, it should be easy to test on the ground
In my RC airplane time I used wooden props, because you could see the nylon ones bend while adjusting the carburator. With high power engines nylon props could even break under load, and I have seen that often. I don't have my rpm meter anymore, but I guess that the props on a Phantom spin rather fast. So imo the nylon props bend and twist under load and therefore there efficiency reduces.What information do you have to support this claim? Testing would show that there is no gain with CF props. DJI states the same.
This post has gone on&on when the answer to any phantom mod is if it isnt quite rite then change itMaybe I will. Wrap the blades in foil to see if that causes a problem.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.