And what is it you like and don't like about it?
I wanna buy a system and add the mini osd. I've been reading but some of the info is dated and lots of it isn't really consolidated into one place. Not sure if I'd like goggles or just an LCD to view with. I'd think I could at lease share the experience with a display. I get the need for circular polarized antennas or perhaps directional antennas but I'm not gonna fly this far. The phantom gear is only good to a Km anyways. But, I read the 5.8 is only good for line of sight. Is this true? I can't fly around a house without pic breaking up? Or through the woods? The idea is NOT to have to have line sight. I also read that 1.3Ghz and 900Mhz systems have more punch power but perhaps those are more needed for people flying 5 miles away and back. I'm guessing that the fatshark systems are the way to go and I should perhaps pick one of those based on cost. But was really curious what it is you don't like about yours and how well the goggles work and feel.
Thanks!
I wanna buy a system and add the mini osd. I've been reading but some of the info is dated and lots of it isn't really consolidated into one place. Not sure if I'd like goggles or just an LCD to view with. I'd think I could at lease share the experience with a display. I get the need for circular polarized antennas or perhaps directional antennas but I'm not gonna fly this far. The phantom gear is only good to a Km anyways. But, I read the 5.8 is only good for line of sight. Is this true? I can't fly around a house without pic breaking up? Or through the woods? The idea is NOT to have to have line sight. I also read that 1.3Ghz and 900Mhz systems have more punch power but perhaps those are more needed for people flying 5 miles away and back. I'm guessing that the fatshark systems are the way to go and I should perhaps pick one of those based on cost. But was really curious what it is you don't like about yours and how well the goggles work and feel.
Thanks!