My car can accelerate up to 130mph, that however does not make it legal. Unless I take it to a race track or private rally club track.Dji advertises safe and easy to fly with a range of 5km ! You do know that right????lolView attachment 36768
My car can accelerate up to 130mph, that however does not make it legal. Unless I take it to a race track or private rally club track.Dji advertises safe and easy to fly with a range of 5km ! You do know that right????lolView attachment 36768
Duh...what's your point? I was replying to the statement that the phantom is not capable of flying safely 4km away.My car can accelerate up to 130mph, that however does not make it legal. Unless I take it to a race track or private rally club track.
The term line of sight needs to be used correctly . LOS has nothing to do with seeing your phantom . What your describing is visual line of sight . Which is completely different than line of sight. LOS in theory can be infinite . LOS is an invisible line between transmitter and receiver. As long as there is nothing between the two than line of sight is estsblished.You should stay line of sight (about 1400' with my eyes on a clear day) and below 400' in the USA. Just like most highways in the US have speed limits and a bunch of other rules as well.
It is great to have much better reception (just like it is nice to have a powerful engine in your car), but if flown as recommended by the FAA and AMA then the P3P is really good and the video downlink fantastic. Much better than my DJI 5.8GHZ system on my S800 with Zenmuse.
And if everyone flew the P3Ps this way we would have far fewer unexplained crashes and fly aways.
OK I stand corrected. Always maintain Visual Direct Contact. This can't be using any binoculars, just your eyes and corrective lenses. Or you can have a safety pilot keeping the MR in Visual Range. It is the only way to fly FPV within the FAA and AMA rules for flying model aircraft in the USA. And it is a very good idea to follow these rules.The term line of sight needs to be used correctly . LOS has nothing to do with seeing your phantom . What your describing is visual line of sight . Which is completely different than line of sight. LOS in theory can be infinite . LOS is an invisible line between transmitter and receiver. As long as there is nothing between the two than line of sight is estsblished.
Just playing devils advocate here but rules or recommendations are not laws. Just sayingOK I stand corrected. Always maintain Visual Direct Contact. This can't be using any binoculars, just your eyes and corrective lenses. Or you can have a safety pilot keeping the MR in Visual Range. It is the only way to fly FPV within the FAA and AMA rules for flying model aircraft in the USA. And it is a very good idea to follow these rules.
???If you are am AMA member and you don't follow the rules, your insurance from AMA is not covering you.
And if something bad happens and you were not following the FAA regulations, they may very well come after you and that can be expensive. Like the first time a commercial aircraft and a MR collide, do you really think the FAA, NTSB and FBI would not try to find the MR pilot and come after her or him with a vengeance.
It is up to you but I play within the rules, I think they make a lot of sense. I am also a GA pilot and I would like to think that every MR operator follow these rules and regulations, just like I follow the FAA part 91 and part 135 rules when flying an aircraft. The rules governing model aircraft are part of the same set of FAA rules and they do regulate the airspace in the USA.
Basically just fly safe and have fun, don't tempt fate. Use common sense.
I support it too, never said I didn't. Geofence is necessary to prevent the reckless, inexperienced, and "this is my right to fly where I want" sort of people to cause trouble where they have no business to be.Flawless everytime!! Can you show me of evidence that shows a long range flight ending bad. What's dangerous is people flying around buildings and places where they shouldn't be. Such as the thanksgiving day parade . I support the geofence . I think it's a great idea.
The term line of sight needs to be used correctly . LOS has nothing to do with seeing your phantom . What your describing is visual line of sight . Which is completely different than line of sight. LOS in theory can be infinite . LOS is an invisible line between transmitter and receiver. As long as there is nothing between the two than line of sight is estsblished.
In the UK, LOS or VLOS is the same thing. It means: As long as you see your aircraft. And whatever happens, the limit is 400ft height, 500m radius.OK I stand corrected. Always maintain Visual Direct Contact. This can't be using any binoculars, just your eyes and corrective lenses. Or you can have a safety pilot keeping the MR in Visual Range. It is the only way to fly FPV within the FAA and AMA rules for flying model aircraft in the USA. And it is a very good idea to follow these rules.
You could replace your DJI 5.8 by a Amimon Connex. Full HD 1920X1080, and zero latency...You should stay line of sight (about 1400' with my eyes on a clear day) and below 400' in the USA. Just like most highways in the US have speed limits and a bunch of other rules as well.
It is great to have much better reception (just like it is nice to have a powerful engine in your car), but if flown as recommended by the FAA and AMA then the P3P is really good and the video downlink fantastic. Much better than my DJI 5.8GHZ system on my S800 with Zenmuse.
And if everyone flew the P3Ps this way we would have far fewer unexplained crashes and fly aways.
In the UK, LOS or VLOS is the same thing. It means: As long as you see your aircraft. And whatever happens, the limit is 400ft height, 500m radius.
I was making the point that as a pilot flying a full scale GA (general civil aviation) or commercial plane I follow the FAA rules (part 91 and 135 are those rules) it is what helps make our air space system safe. Before regulation in aviation early history the safety record was atrocious. The rules have been developed by studying accidents and aircraft construction for a century and have helped make aviation one of the safest form of travel. Operating a model aircraft is actually part of this system so we should all obey by the rules to help us all stay safe.Can you explain part 91 and part 135 as it pertains to the use of uav's . I'm not familiar with all the rules.
So much misinformation about GEO.Be very careful what you are willing to give up, because it may sound good until you lose it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.