That footage looks terrible, but that has nothing to do with the filters..... It just looks like you had some wrong settings or recording with the intent of post processing and then never did.
I am not really sure if ND 16 filter is a real ND 16. I have two different ND filters and I get different results for same camera settingsHas anyone done a comparison between ND16 and selecting "Sunny" w/o filter?
I normally shoot using 16:9, seems that some settings were indeed screwed up this time. I also prefer photos 16:9.Any 4:3 video will look like it came from 2004. It's will also look of poor quality.
Yes you are probably right about this. Mostly I also use only the supplied UV-filter. I did experiment earlier with the ND8 filter and stills, and got some quite nice and interesting results. Attached is an example photo using ND8.You see this is what happens when people recommend improving video quality by using ND filters and indeed LOG mode.
Both are really relatively advanced techniques requiring adjustments to white balance, contrast and saturation as a minimum.
The P3 will do much better if you just set it on Auto and style 'None' - and use supplied clear filter until you know what you are doing.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.