Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Industries
Surveying and Mapping
P4RTK/PPK processing v GCPs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LMO" data-source="post: 1513928" data-attributes="member: 127436"><p>Hi all,</p><p></p><p>As a survey company we are at the beginning of our commercial drone practice.</p><p></p><p>We already own a standard P4pro but would purchase a P4RTK (to be processed as PPK possibly using Propeller or another service provider) and GCPs as checks, if it made commercial sense</p><p></p><p>In your opinion does this make sense to upgrade to another phantom 4 when we already have one even though it has the RTK/PPK functionality? </p><p></p><p>I like the argument I have read on an earlier post that if you are flying narrow corridors or over private land you just cannot place the required number of GCPs so it seems like RTK/PPK would be ideal</p><p>Thoughts???</p><p></p><p>We are in construction surveying.</p><p></p><p>Thanks in advance</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LMO, post: 1513928, member: 127436"] Hi all, As a survey company we are at the beginning of our commercial drone practice. We already own a standard P4pro but would purchase a P4RTK (to be processed as PPK possibly using Propeller or another service provider) and GCPs as checks, if it made commercial sense In your opinion does this make sense to upgrade to another phantom 4 when we already have one even though it has the RTK/PPK functionality? I like the argument I have read on an earlier post that if you are flying narrow corridors or over private land you just cannot place the required number of GCPs so it seems like RTK/PPK would be ideal Thoughts??? We are in construction surveying. Thanks in advance [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Industries
Surveying and Mapping
P4RTK/PPK processing v GCPs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
