I hope that is is okay to provide a link to this story:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2105800/ ... tk.rss_all
Looks like there will be some changes to FAA rules. Personally, I think that it should be legal to use the drones for commercial purposes, under 400', with the consent of persons or property owners appearing in photos or videos. In other words sell photos of property for home owners and or real estate agencies. In the case that identifiable persons are in photos, then a model release could be required.
Certainly, since the government can take our photos with surveillance satellites and aircraft WITHOUT consent, it only makes sense that citizens should have the above rights.
Perhaps the moderator would like to start a new topic for discussion on this matter and invite members to petition congress with some proposals.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2105800/ ... tk.rss_all
Looks like there will be some changes to FAA rules. Personally, I think that it should be legal to use the drones for commercial purposes, under 400', with the consent of persons or property owners appearing in photos or videos. In other words sell photos of property for home owners and or real estate agencies. In the case that identifiable persons are in photos, then a model release could be required.
Certainly, since the government can take our photos with surveillance satellites and aircraft WITHOUT consent, it only makes sense that citizens should have the above rights.
Perhaps the moderator would like to start a new topic for discussion on this matter and invite members to petition congress with some proposals.