FAA to UAS Violation Enforcement for December 2021 (hopefully one of many)

BigAl07

Administrator
Staff Member
Premium Pilot
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
7,043
Reaction score
5,903
Age
51
Location
Western North Carolina
As you'll soon be hearing from @Vic Moss and Greg @pilotinstitute have been working to get more "information" released to the public about enforcement actions/fines/sanctions that have been taken against UAS operations. In our FAA Safty Team report we finally had a tid bit we can share.

This is taken directly from the EMAIL but expect more from those I mentioned at the start of this:

"Recent Drone Enforcement Case
In December 2021, the FAA issued a fine to a drone operator for flying a drone over protest events in upstate New York. The regulations violated by the recreational flyer that happened during a series of three separate flights in October and November 2020. The self-proclaimed recreational flyer did not comply with all of the eight requirements listed in section (a) of 49 USC § 44809 — the exception for limited recreational operations of unmanned aircraft. Section (b) of the statute states when recreational flyers fail to comply with any of the eight limitations contained in section (a), they must comply with the applicable regulations governing the operation of drones. In this case, since the drone was a small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS), 14 CFR part 107 was the applicable regulatory part.
The FAA investigation revealed the flights were over people, at night, in controlled airspace without an authorization, and posed a hazard to people and property below. As a result, the FAA determined the operator of the drone was in noncompliance with section 44809 and therefore subject to 14 CFR part 107. The following list of regulations were cited in the enforcement case:

  1. 107.12(b): no remote pilot certificate.
  2. 107.13: drone not registered.
  3. 107.19(c): posing a hazard to people, aircraft, or property.
  4. 107.23(a): careless or reckless flying.
  5. 107.29(a): flying at night without a waiver (prior to the new operations over people or at night rule).
  6. 107.39: flying over people without a waiver (prior to the new operations over people or at night rule).
  7. 107.41: flying in controlled airspace without authorization.
  8. 107.65: no 24 month recency of knowledge.
The drone operator was assessed a civil penalty for $15,205 which had to be paid immediately.

Hopefully this is the first of many publications so we can actually let you know what CAN happen if you insist on being "That guy/girl".
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
409
Reaction score
245
Age
50
Location
Pennsylvania
I for one am glad the FAA is going to start cracking down on the people that make all of us look bad. I do my best to follow all the rules and regulations, have my 107, pay my insurance bill and am tired of “some” people making me look bad!!
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
298
Age
67
Location
KVNY
Did anything happen to the guy who flew over the Bengals game?
 
Joined
May 19, 2015
Messages
113
Reaction score
58
I think I know who this individual is. He has a video / photo production company and routinely posts aerial images on FB from around the Albany area, bragging about what it looks like from 1200' or more. Some people comment about the rules he's breaking but he doesn't engage with them. Part of the issue is that the average public commenter loves the image and encourages him to post more. Some of Albany is controlled airpsace. I haven't noticed that any of his images are in that airspace, but flights over people, vehicles and excessive altitude is his norm.

Recently, there's another local with a YT channel about remote controlled cars that now has a Mavic Air. He seems to think it's launch from a Wendy's parking lot and fly two miles down the main streets in Saratoga, over buildings, cars, people, etc. He posts links to his YT videos on FB and people love it, ask for more.

I'm glad the FAA is fining people. They deserve it. How can one be so clueless?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adamborz
Joined
Aug 16, 2020
Messages
26
Reaction score
12
Age
54
Location
North Central Md
As you'll soon be hearing from @Vic Moss and Greg @pilotinstitute have been working to get more "information" released to the public about enforcement actions/fines/sanctions that have been taken against UAS operations. In our FAA Safty Team report we finally had a tid bit we can share.

This is taken directly from the EMAIL but expect more from those I mentioned at the start of this:

"Recent Drone Enforcement Case
In December 2021, the FAA issued a fine to a drone operator for flying a drone over protest events in upstate New York. The regulations violated by the recreational flyer that happened during a series of three separate flights in October and November 2020. The self-proclaimed recreational flyer did not comply with all of the eight requirements listed in section (a) of 49 USC § 44809 — the exception for limited recreational operations of unmanned aircraft. Section (b) of the statute states when recreational flyers fail to comply with any of the eight limitations contained in section (a), they must comply with the applicable regulations governing the operation of drones. In this case, since the drone was a small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS), 14 CFR part 107 was the applicable regulatory part.
The FAA investigation revealed the flights were over people, at night, in controlled airspace without an authorization, and posed a hazard to people and property below. As a result, the FAA determined the operator of the drone was in noncompliance with section 44809 and therefore subject to 14 CFR part 107. The following list of regulations were cited in the enforcement case:

  1. 107.12(b): no remote pilot certificate.
  2. 107.13: drone not registered.
  3. 107.19(c): posing a hazard to people, aircraft, or property.
  4. 107.23(a): careless or reckless flying.
  5. 107.29(a): flying at night without a waiver (prior to the new operations over people or at night rule).
  6. 107.39: flying over people without a waiver (prior to the new operations over people or at night rule).
  7. 107.41: flying in controlled airspace without authorization.
  8. 107.65: no 24 month recency of knowledge.
The drone operator was assessed a civil penalty for $15,205 which had to be paid immediately.

Hopefully this is the first of many publications so we can actually let you know what CAN happen if you insist on being "That guy/girl".
Thanks for sharing the news, Big Al
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigAl07

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
142,053
Messages
1,460,316
Members
103,833
Latest member
Garry_51